|
|
#61
11-11-2005, 04:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
[ QUOTE ]
Neither 45% ITM nor 36% ROI are possible at the 55's. [/ QUOTE ] ?? You sure..? I was 34% ROI at the 55's over about 2k $55 SNG's until I lost my PT db. Since then I've got 39.8% ITM/31.6% ROI% over 1400 $55 sng's. And there are definitely better players than me around, so I wouldn't rule out someone making it 36% ROI. edit: the tough part might be getting both 40% ITM and 36% ROI at the same time...but who gives a XXX about ITM anyway... 
|
|
#63
11-11-2005, 04:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
[ QUOTE ]
I play mainly 33's - 55's. Some 109's. Not claiming those were my numbers, either, but I dont think 40% ITM at $55 is unreasonable. [/ QUOTE ] My ITM at the 55's is currently 39.81% over 1400. I could definitely improve that, but it'd probably drop my ROI. I'm sure there are a bunch of posters here who hit 40 and the 30's for ITM and ROI respectively.
|
|
#64
11-11-2005, 05:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
[ QUOTE ]
I beat the 55s for 12% No offense, but I don't consider a 12% SNG ROI to be "beating" anything. Randomly, you should be ITM 30% of the time. To my mind, the threshhold of "beating" them is a 50% increase over the average, or 45% ITM. At 45% ITM spread evenly over the 3 payout spots (assuming a 10-handed table), your ROI should be 36%. [/ QUOTE ] Your "beating" measuring methods are WAY off, akin to saying if the average baseball player hits .260, to be REALLY doing well, you should hit .390.
|
|
#66
11-11-2005, 08:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
[ QUOTE ]
I was 34% ROI at the 55's over about 2k $55 SNG's until I lost my PT db. Since then I've got 39.8% ITM/31.6% ROI% over 1400 $55 sng's. [/ QUOTE ] You are literally the biggest winner I've ever heard of for that sample size and without denigrating your abilities, I believe you're probably running hot unless you are < 4 tabling. It might be barely possible now with an extra level added in and some TAG's removed because of the skins, I dunno. 45% ITM is one of those things that you could maybe do in a vacuum, but you'd probably wind up losing money overall, so why bother?
|
|
#67
11-11-2005, 09:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
I'm surprised that's the best you've heard of at the 55's.
I'm not convinced it's running hot; my PS turbo 55's were low 30's ROI as well, but I dont play them much now. Whatever, if it is running hot then I hope I stay hot for the next few thousand sng's as well... [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] 6-8 tables. 4-6 sng's plus a few MTT's is the order of things for me.
|
|
#68
11-12-2005, 02:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
Jesus. Those are some CRAZY stats Dogsballs.
I had a 700 SNG breakeven stretch last month. However, my game had slipped then because I was trying to do 50 every day and would focus on just hammering that out.
|
|
#70
11-12-2005, 02:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all of the downswing whiners around here
[ QUOTE ]
Jesus. Those are some CRAZY stats Dogsballs. I had a 700 SNG breakeven stretch last month. However, my game had slipped then because I was trying to do 50 every day and would focus on just hammering that out. [/ QUOTE ] i have found that when i do this, i always run [censored]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
