Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-09-2005, 10:09 PM
joop joop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 65
Default simple stats question

I have run at -0.41 over my last 12k hands. It has felt like I've run pretty badly, lots of bad beats, missing flops, etc... but, when comparing my VPIP, W$WSF, WTSD and W$SD to my full database of 115k hands at this limit, all my stats are pretty much the same. Is this possible? Or have I just been playing losing poker for the last 12k hands? I am starting to have doubts about my game [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Any advice appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-09-2005, 10:17 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: simple stats question

which limits are you currently playing at? To be honest, 12k hands is a lot to be playing losing poker (in my opinion), but you may be at a limit, or playing in a game with some tough competition that you aren't ready for yet. Also, with my experiences, if you are playing a limit lower than .50/$1, stats get all messes up, because of the lack of quality players, and plays at those limits.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-09-2005, 10:22 PM
DMBFan23 DMBFan23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I don\'t want a large Farva
Posts: 417
Default Re: simple stats question

[ QUOTE ]
which limits are you currently playing at? To be honest, 12k hands is a lot to be playing losing poker (in my opinion), but you may be at a limit, or playing in a game with some tough competition that you aren't ready for yet. Also, with my experiences, if you are playing a limit lower than .50/$1, stats get all messes up, because of the lack of quality players, and plays at those limits.

[/ QUOTE ]

I recommend you look at the 6 max graph thread for more info. you can play winning poker for many more hands than this and still be in the red, especially at 6max
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-09-2005, 10:26 PM
imported_leader imported_leader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Around Boston
Posts: 510
Default Re: simple stats question

It happens. Good players have reported longer stretches with worse results.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-09-2005, 10:28 PM
joop joop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 65
Default Re: simple stats question

Yes, I understand this. However, when I have run bad in the past, my VPIP would be slightly lower (not getting dealt good cards), WTSD would be lower (folding more before showdown), as would W$SF, and W$SD would be signigicantly lower(losing showdowns when I do get there). This is what I am asking, is it possible for all your stats to look good, but still be losing, even while playing winning poker.

I play 3/6, btw.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-09-2005, 10:30 PM
jdl22 jdl22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 609
Default Re: simple stats question

It's possible.

Say you win 58% at showdown. In your bad run you could still win that often but you are simply winning loads of small pots and losing big ones. Same principle applies to the other stats.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-09-2005, 10:35 PM
imported_leader imported_leader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Around Boston
Posts: 510
Default Re: simple stats question

[ QUOTE ]
Yes, I understand this. However, when I have run bad in the past, my VPIP would be slightly lower (not getting dealt good cards), WTSD would be lower (folding more before showdown), as would W$SF, and W$SD would be signigicantly lower(losing showdowns when I do get there). This is what I am asking, is it possible for all your stats to look good, but still be losing, even while playing winning poker.

I play 3/6, btw.

[/ QUOTE ]

I recommend the following:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/remlin...mp;Main=3383209

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...t=1#Post1342415
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-09-2005, 10:40 PM
joop joop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 65
Default Re: simple stats question

Thanks JaredL and leader.

[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-09-2005, 10:55 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: simple stats question

10k is pretty light, and I've run far worse than that for that sample size. If you posted negative to marginal results for about 30k+ you should start to be concerned, regardless of how you've thought you ran.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-09-2005, 11:11 PM
joop joop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 65
Default Re: simple stats question

[ QUOTE ]
10k is pretty light, and I've run far worse than that for that sample size. If you posted negative to marginal results for about 30k+ you should start to be concerned, regardless of how you've thought you ran.

[/ QUOTE ]

How I ran wasn't the point of my post though... it was how my stats correlateled to when I ran bad and when I ran good.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.