Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-16-2005, 07:31 PM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 382
Default Re: One Thread for WSOP is beyond lame.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Locking threads to force people over to one MAIN thread is really ludicrous.

You are just limiting the discussion by burdening people with a ridiculously long thread to discuss something. I thought the forum was to discuss a wide variety of topic, so why pigeon hole ideas?

[/ QUOTE ]

Couldn't ... agree ... more.

One long thread is a terrible terrible idea.

Let's carry this "logic" out and just make one 50,000 post thread on 2+2 under one forum called "Poker + Other".

[/ QUOTE ]

Amen brother.

Good luck convincing tho.

Multiple threads on exact same thing=bad
Multiple threads on different sitations and perspectives on one specific subject=good
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-16-2005, 07:36 PM
B Dids B Dids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sea-town!!
Posts: 326
Default Re: One Thread for WSOP is beyond lame.

As evidenced by this and other threads still existing, what you're suggesting is what I'm aiming for. The threads that I've killed have all been ideas that weren't new, or that would warrent another topics worth of discussion.

The fact is that there's plenty of "Lazar WTF" posts in the official thread, and a "Lazar WTF" thread doesn't really bring anything new to the table.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-16-2005, 07:54 PM
BillFranklin BillFranklin is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 20
Default Re: One Thread for WSOP is beyond lame.

[ QUOTE ]
As evidenced by this and other threads still existing, what you're suggesting is what I'm aiming for. The threads that I've killed have all been ideas that weren't new, or that would warrent another topics worth of discussion.

The fact is that there's plenty of "Lazar WTF" posts in the official thread, and a "Lazar WTF" thread doesn't really bring anything new to the table.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is stupid. No other forum i've ever been a part has operated like this. If i want to talk about Lazar for ex, i had wade through multiple "Kanter is donkey" posts (or whatever) Here's a compromise: Why don't you do this:

The official "Is Kanter a donkey?" thread
the official "Did Black misplay his set of 5's" thread
The official "Lazur- meldown of the year" thread
The official "Final hand" Thread
The official "Matusow KK hand " Thread
The offical "Tex Barch all in hand" Thread

I'm sure there are others I can't recall at this moment.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-16-2005, 08:05 PM
grandgnu grandgnu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pokah Is Nice, I Love Play Pokah (Chau Giang quote) Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 757
Default Re: One Thread for WSOP is beyond lame.

I CALL! I'LL GAMBLE WITH YA! *SHOWS Q/10 OFFSUIT*




TIIIIIIILLLLT! (I CAN'T BELIEVE I FOLDED A/5 TO A PRE-FLOP RAISE!)
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-16-2005, 08:25 PM
Vincent Lepore Vincent Lepore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 570
Default Re: WSOP final table quality of play

[ QUOTE ]
If this trend continues the main event will fade into oblivion.


[/ QUOTE ]

Don't kid yourself. Just the opposite is true. Pro's might not watch or watch and laugh but the public will love it.

Vince
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.