|
|
|
|
#1
12-29-2005, 11:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQ vs a utg limper
Against a very passive post flop player, I don't really like being raised here on the rvr. It would help to have some notes on this player. Being 4 bet on the river by a passive player is almost always going to be the nuts. For many the first raise on the river would probably be the nuts.
So unless I had seen him do some bluff raises , or raising with non-nut hands, I would just call his river raise. 
|
|
#2
12-30-2005, 07:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AQ vs a utg limper
If he had something like KJ, why didn't he go nuts on the turn? I'm not ready to buy that he has a straight, unless he has abnormal aggression tendencies that suggest he always waits until the river.
I 3-bet this near all the time. If I knew he'd cap it, I probably wouldn't though. He could be raising with any Q, any T, or it might even be a slowplayed AA / KK. Either way, one lousy river raise to me does not signify that trips with top kicker is now a second best hand, so I push it, and punch a small kitten when he caps it.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
