Evelyn Eng busted out via Runner Runner

Enecoman · #1 01-09-2005, 07:00 PM

Glad to see that online players are doing well but sucking out a flush with runner runner on an all-in 66 vs. AK is weak.

Tosh · #2 01-09-2005, 07:04 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Glad to see that online players are doing well but sucking out a flush with runner runner on an all-in 66 vs. AK is weak.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your post is weak, the best hand held up in an all in situation, and that is all that happened.

CCx · #3 01-09-2005, 07:07 PM

You could also try the correct spelling of her name in your topic next time, that's pretty weak. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Enecoman · #4 01-09-2005, 07:09 PM

another malcontent here trying to pick an arguement over nothing. If you want to argue that 66 make an all-on off a re-raise of 72K, go ahead. I am sure you will find plenty of people to fight with.

I am constantly amazed at how people will jump on other posters at the drop of a hat.

Anytime you want a game bring it.

Tosh · #5 01-09-2005, 07:16 PM

[ QUOTE ]

I am constantly amazed at how people will jump on other posters at the drop of a hat.

[/ QUOTE ]

You made a post that was just plain wrong. The better hand held up, no suckout here.

slickpoppa · #6 01-09-2005, 07:17 PM

[ QUOTE ]
another malcontent here trying to pick an arguement over nothing. If you want to argue that 66 make an all-on off a re-raise of 72K, go ahead. I am sure you will find plenty of people to fight with.

I am constantly amazed at how people will jump on other posters at the drop of a hat.

Anytime you want a game bring it.

[/ QUOTE ]
First of all, the title of your post was clearly deceptive because all of the money got in preflop.
Second of all, you do not know enough about the context of the hand (stack sizes, previous raises, etc.) to make any kind of judgement about whether the play was correct.

Enecoman · #7 01-09-2005, 07:22 PM

a. He had no idea what she had. IMO going all-in off a re-raise of 72K with 66 is a horrible play.

b. Since an A did in fact hit on the flop, the 66 was a huge dog.

that about covers it.

stabn · #8 01-09-2005, 07:24 PM

There's a lot of things he could have done better. Like maybe not calling it runner runner when either of her sixes would have won it for her as well.

Tosh · #9 01-09-2005, 07:26 PM

[ QUOTE ]
a. He had no idea what she had. IMO going all-in off a re-raise of 72K with 66 is a horrible play.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well maybe its a bad play, maybe not, but thats not possible to determine unless you were there.

[ QUOTE ]
b. Since an A did in fact hit on the flop, the 66 was a huge dog.

[/ QUOTE ]

Irrelevant, money was all in preflop.

slickpoppa · #10 01-09-2005, 07:28 PM

[ QUOTE ]
b. Since an A did in fact hit on the flop, the 66 was a huge dog.

[/ QUOTE ]
That doesn't matter. All of the money got in preflop, when he was a slight favorite.
Or maybe you think that the order of the cards matter, in which case you are an idiot.