|
|
#1
04-17-2005, 03:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
POP: Reading Recommendations on Improving Card Reading Skills
I'm reading Psychology of Poker (POP), a great book so far. In the section on Reading Hands, Dr. Schoonmaker gives some specific reading recommendations for further study (a very nice touch). He recommends pp. 48-60 of Theory of Poker. However, when I look at those pages in the edition I have that doesn't seem correct. Is it possible that he is referring to chapter 22, "Reading Hands"? My appologies if this has been asked and answered before. I did spend some time with search, but couldn't find anything.
|
|
#2
04-17-2005, 03:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: POP: Reading Recommendations on Improving Card Reading Skills
[ QUOTE ]
I'm reading Psychology of Poker (POP), a great book so far. In the section on Reading Hands, Dr. Schoonmaker gives some specific reading recommendations for further study (a very nice touch). He recommends pp. 48-60 of Theory of Poker. However, when I look at those pages in the edition I have that doesn't seem correct. Is it possible that he is referring to chapter 22, "Reading Hands"? My appologies if this has been asked and answered before. I did spend some time with search, but couldn't find anything. [/ QUOTE ] No offense, but what do you think?
|
|
#4
04-17-2005, 03:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: POP: Reading Recommendations on Improving Card Reading Skills
[ QUOTE ]
No offense, but what do you think? [/ QUOTE ] So, you see how important it is for me to study this topic! I made a decent read on the situation, but I had no confidence in it. No offense taken, although I think you *could* be bluffing. [Edit: one reason for the question was that the pages references were WAY different. pp. 48-60 versus pp. 221-233.]
|
|
#5
04-17-2005, 09:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: POP: Reading Recommendations on Improving Card Reading Skills
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] No offense, but what do you think? [/ QUOTE ] So, you see how important it is for me to study this topic! I made a decent read on the situation, but I had no confidence in it. No offense taken, although I think you *could* be bluffing. [Edit: one reason for the question was that the pages references were WAY different. pp. 48-60 versus pp. 221-233.] [/ QUOTE ] Heh, like I said, no offense, but you truely are an Einstein. Quite honestly, I don't have Dr. Al's book, so I can't comment on the hand-reading reference to TOP in it. But, the chapter I think he is referring is the chapter you mentioned. I would not know why there is such a huge difference in page numbers other than the fact that there may be a typo or something of that nature.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
