|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $27... another hand in push fold mode... AQ
Why are we afraid of a coinflip if we have 50% of the third-largest stack and everyone is in the red zone? I though we were supposed to be looking for coinflips in this situation.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $27... another hand in push fold mode... AQ
Never mind the red zone, whatever that actually means anyways, I'm more interested in the fact that several stacks are quite a way ahead of us and we're far from the bubble, which is why my default would be to call as much as anything.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $27... another hand in push fold mode... AQ
[ QUOTE ]
Never mind the red zone, whatever that actually means anyways. [/ QUOTE ] It means stack sizes vs. cost-per-orbit is so low that no real meaning can be read into all-in bets. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $27... another hand in push fold mode... AQ
Oh well, that wouldn't even enter my mind here, honestly. Not when the pusher has 8BB.. if he had 5-6, maybe.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $27... another hand in push fold mode... AQ
[ QUOTE ]
Oh well, that wouldn't even enter my mind here, honestly. Not when the pusher has 8BB.. if he had 5-6, maybe. [/ QUOTE ] I think I see your point: AQ and this chip position at this level = autocall, a decision which can be arrived at pretty much independently of pusher's M, etc. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $27... another hand in push fold mode... AQ
Yeah. Read microbet's post as he's pretty much got it licked as to why I would call here.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $27... another hand in push fold mode... AQ
[ QUOTE ]
Never mind the red zone, whatever that actually means anyways, I'm more interested in the fact that several stacks are quite a way ahead of us and we're far from the bubble, which is why my default would be to call as much as anything. [/ QUOTE ] hm...(Shnarf process the thoughts as he learns something new)... Once again - things I think about...but don't necessarily consiously think about intentionally in these spots.. Thanks for the reminder... |
|
|