|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
what the fuk is royal holdem?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
Complete tard poker, how fun.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
[ QUOTE ]
Complete tard poker, how fun. [/ QUOTE ] This game rules. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
I just played it for a minute. Crazy. Flop two pair like every hand. Holdem with a pinochle deck. Sorta.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
[ QUOTE ]
I just played it for a minute. Crazy. Flop two pair like every hand. Holdem with a pinochle deck. Sorta. [/ QUOTE ] A pinochle deck is double a euchre deck right? So the board could come out five aces. What the hell kind of game is that? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
[ QUOTE ]
what the fuk is royal holdem? [/ QUOTE ] I'm guessing that it's holdem with only Tens, Jacks, Queens, Kings, and Aces. If so, it can be dealt 7-handed with no burn cards. 6-handed with three burn cards. Probably a nut-peddling game like Limit Omaha High, but with a higher risk of collusion, like the original poster stated, with the smaller deck. With two players holding 20% of the deck pre-flop, and with 35% known post flop, it would be incredibly easy to do. Add in the fact that everybody gets dealt broadway, and the worst you can have on the flop is a pair and a gutshot, and the fish have no chance. 31-1 to get pocket aces in this game. Someone correct me, please, if I'm wrong about the structure of the game. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
Thats it
|
|
|