|
|
#21
09-22-2005, 11:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Stay back 100 ft\"
what it really means is that in the event of damages they will not take any responsibility. so you are forced to sue to have any chance of collecting from them. it works as a notice to what you can expect. its a good thing to know their intentions so you can act accordingly.
|
|
#22
09-22-2005, 11:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \"Stay back 100 ft\"
[ QUOTE ]
what it really means is that in the event of damages they will not take any responsibility. so you are forced to sue to have any chance of collecting from them. it works as a notice to what you can expect. its a good thing to know their intentions so you can act accordingly. [/ QUOTE ] So true, and yet society is convinced that lawyers are to blame for the problem that everything needs to be litigated these days.
|
|
#23
09-23-2005, 12:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \"Stay back 100 ft\"
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Yup. One of the annoying manifestations of this happens at bookstores, where they make you hand over your bags but then the employees go strolling around the store yapping it up without watching them. Absurd. It even gives the employees carte blanche to steal your stuff when you turn the corner and then point to the sign. Even more is that it's almost always sexualized, in that they will ask men to give up a bag but not women, and they will also do it on a class basis, not bothering to ask if you're well dressed, but hassling you if you're wearing jeans. [/ QUOTE ] Moral of the story: Always dress your girlfriend up nicely before sending her into a bookstore to shoplift. [/ QUOTE ] Was Winnona Ryder not dressed nicely?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
