single Chip strutcure limit games. I concede the previous debate.

[steamboatin]

A few months ago, we had a big discussion about limit games that used a single chip, 5-10 played with red chips, etc. I was basing my posistion upon the room at Grand Victoria that had recently opened and had plenty of action.

I am reopening the discussion and conceding defeat. The 5-10 game at Grand Vic sucks and the 5-10 at Ceasar's In is barely worth playing.

the 7.5-15 thread reminded me of the previous discussion and I wanted to let everyone know that time had proven their point.

[SenecaJim]

link to previous discussion ? ( missed it ).

[steamboatin]

I don't remember or I would have linked to it. It might have developed off topic from another thread.

[SenecaJim]

what was core question of single-chip-discussion?

[Durs522]

[ QUOTE ]
what was core question of single-chip-discussion?

[/ QUOTE ]

More chips (3chip/6chip in a 7.50/15 game) induce more action due to the appearance of large pots.

[steamboatin]

Yes, I disagreed but now concede.

[highlife]

single chip does suck. though the 5-10 at the Taj is almost always good.

[tpir90036]

</font><blockquote><font class="small">In risposta di:</font><hr />
single chip does suck. though the 5-10 at the Taj is almost always good.

[/ QUOTE ]
But not nearly as good as the borgata 6-12 [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Although that game can run really slow sometimes since the dealer is making red chip change constantly.

[Rasputin]

[ QUOTE ]
More chips (3chip/6chip in a 7.50/15 game) induce more action due to the appearance of large pots.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's totally retarded.

[bdk3clash]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
More chips (3chip/6chip in a 7.50/15 game) induce more action due to the appearance of large pots.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's totally retarded.

[/ QUOTE ]
Your logic is flawless! Why, this theory would suggest that most low limit hold'em playesrs don't make rational choices while they're playing.