Is It Possible To Win A Tight Hold 'em Game, Theoretically?

[gambledrum]

Can a good player expect to win when playing ultra-tight tables?

I'm a micro-small stakes hold 'em player. I decided a few months to start playing online, basically to play more hands per hour. I play anywhere from 0.25-50 to 1-2, for the most part. I've noticed an immense difference between B&M low stakes (in South Florida were restricted to 1-2 hold 'em) and online low stakes. Basically, the online players I'm running into tend to be much tighter than the B&M rooms. I'm currently playing at Royal Vegas Poker. Three to five players to the flop is the rule. Many times the blinds are folded by a raise. Keep in mind, I'm talking about 0.50-1 hold 'em. This is a complete contrast from playing 1-2 in the B&M rooms, where 7-9 players are the norm, and you almost never see blinds folding, even after multiple raises. So, there's a large difference between the pot sizes I've seen online and in person.

Miller states in SSH:
"If your opponents all played "perfect" poker, you could not possibly win in the long run. He goes on to say, "In fact, if you play in a casino or any place that takes a collection or rake, you would be doomed to lose as surely as if you played craps, roulette, or keno." Furthermore, he says, "Be glad your opponents refuse to fold; if they didn't, you might just go broke."

I often heard that you can expect to make 2 big bets per 100 hands, if you’re a good player. I’ve also heard that you could expect to make much more in ultra-loose games. But, what about ultra-tight games, with tricky players? Does the 2BB/100 hands scenario hold up? What is the proper sample size of hands to test your win rate on?

Essentially, I wondering if you can theoretically win a very tight game. Or, is it essential for the game to be somewhat loose to make money? Maybe I’m playing at the wrong website. Average pot sizes for a ten person 0.25-0.50 table are $2-3, at Royal Vegas Poker. But, when I check other sites, the average pot size tends to be larger ($3-4).

Basically, the way I see it, I’m having a harder time making money online because the pot sizes are small. When I hit, the pot isn’t nearly as big a B&M room, but when I miss, drawing odds are terrible.

Any insight?

[TripleH68]

People playing 'tight' poker is MUCH different than people playing 'perfect' poker.

You can beat these games and you make the majority of your $$ postflop.

[NLfool]

in general you should play the opposite of how your opponents play. Since many play loose you should play tight. A tight ring game is fairly easy to beat with position, may not be as profitable, you'll make less BB/100 but your variance will be much lower and most long time players will gladly sacrifice some earnings for less variance. I know, since the Party split or restructure I've experience the most insane swings.

[MicroBob]

There's almost no reason why you shouldn't be able to win at .25/.50 on ANY site.

kinda tight players who are sorta tricky post-flop are almost guaranteed to not be THAT freaking good at .25/.50. Some might be pretty decent....but not all of them....not even close.


[ QUOTE ]

Basically, the way I see it, I’m having a harder time making money online because the pot sizes are small. When I hit, the pot isn’t nearly as big a B&M room, but when I miss, drawing odds are terrible.

Any insight?


[/ QUOTE ]



You are not playing as many of your hands 'correctly' as you think you are.
Consider the possibility that it is YOUR play that you need to work on.
You are playing in games that should be crushable...yet you aren't crushing them.



The reason you aren't winning isn't because a winning player can ONLY win at loose games with terrible players.
The reason is that you are misplaying hands against mediocre to slightly not-so-horrid players and you don't even realize it.


Consider reasing and posting the micro-limits forum here. Much good advice to be had to improve your game.



note - I have never played on royal-vegas...but I refuse to believe that their .25/.50 games are very tough at all and couldn't easily be beaten for 2BB/100.

[RiverDood]

Sounds like you've got two different questions going on here.

1. Is the Royal Vegas .50/$1 game beatable? Sounds like it is. It's definitely tighter than the ultraloose games at B&M casinos, but by online standards, it is not supertight at all. 3-5 players seeing the flop means that at least one or two of them shouldn't be there. . . . If there's a lot of preflop raising, marginal hands shouldn't be limped from early positions (J9s; 33, etc.) About half the players at the table will realize this, and the other half won't. . . . Your job is to punish the limpers with well-aimed raises, reraises and c/rs that isolate their skinny draws heads up wherever possible, or force them to fold well before the river . . . . You also want to stop limping with stuff that only works well in the cheap, multiway pots that are common in loose passive games.

2. Can a truly ultra-tight game be beaten? Yes. Steal blinds. In an extreme case, if everyone else only plays AA, KK, QQ and AKs, you can pick up the blinds constantly by raising with weaker hands. But that's not really a scenario worth examining until much higher limits.

[csuf_gambler]

[ QUOTE ]
in general you should play the opposite of how your opponents play.

[/ QUOTE ]

terrible.

[2+2 wannabe]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
in general you should play the opposite of how your opponents play.

[/ QUOTE ]

terrible.

[/ QUOTE ]

come on - why don't you want to play qto against a 10/2/2 pf raiser [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[genya]

[ QUOTE ]
Can a good player expect to win when playing ultra-tight tables?


[/ QUOTE ]

Part of being a good player is not playing at ultra-tight tables, so I say that your statement is contradictory, because such a case would not exist.

[Niediam]

I almost hate to tell you this but online games where 4-5 people see the flop are considered VERY loose around here.

[pzhon]

I have had no trouble beating the Cryptologic full $1-$2 game, which some call tight.

Example:
MP1 posts. 3 folds, check, two folds, I raise in the CO with 98o, 4 folds. I net $2.50 = 1.25 BB.

Sometimes a maniac will win 6+ pots in a row, since the non-observant multitablers all give him credit for a hand when he calls on the flop and bets or raises the turn, even though he limps with almost every hand, never folds on the flop, and bets when checked to.

Playing tightly preflop is not the same thing as playing well on all 4 streets.