|
|
#1
08-15-2004, 02:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Stats from my last 100 Sit N Go\'s (5+.50 on PS)
1 - 23
2 - 15 3 - 9 4 - 12 5 - 10 6 - 13 7 - 5 8 - 8 9 - 5 Total Won - 801 Total Buy In - 550 Profit - 251 ROI - 45.64% ITM - 47.00% Avg Finish - 4 Any comments? I am thinking of moving up to the $10 tourneys on Stars. 
|
|
#2
08-15-2004, 03:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stats from my last 100 Sit N Go\'s (5+.50 on PS)
Solid work. Definitely move up to 10+1 (or 20+2 if you can afford it). No matter how good you are at the $5 games, even if you're playing several at once, it'll never be worth your time. The $10 and $20 games aren't significantly harder to beat than the $5. Keep in mind though, that 100 tournaments isn't a very good sample. This thread discusses the issue of ROI and sample sizes.
|
|
#3
08-15-2004, 06:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stats from my last 100 Sit N Go\'s (5+.50 on PS)
If you do move up, I'd play a large sample of $10+$1 SNGs on both Stars AND Party, then compare results before settling on a SNG site.
I know the Party software bites, but low-limit SNGs games seem softer. Besides, there's been so much debate on which is better, it would be fun to see someone conduct an experiment to get some data on ROI.
|
|
#4
08-15-2004, 08:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stats from my last 100 Sit N Go\'s (5+.50 on PS)
Move up...the choice of how high depends upon bankroll, really. 10+1 is only marginally better than 5+0.50, and 20+2 is a bit better than 10+1, imho.
Stay at Stars...Party games are softer, but they are more of a crapshoot. Stars has it's share of fish, too (present company hopefully excluded). Play well, CCC
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
