Strategy and Tactics Discussion POLL - Vote on your favorite topics

[jslag]

[ QUOTE ]
why can't I see the results of the poll after I've voted? Who are the early winners?

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Votes accepted from (02/08/05 09:00 PM) to (02/10/05 11:00 AM)
You cannot view poll results until the poll is over.

[/ QUOTE ]

Cool idea, Lloyd.

[SossMan]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
why can't I see the results of the poll after I've voted? Who are the early winners?

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Votes accepted from (02/08/05 09:00 PM) to (02/10/05 11:00 AM)
You cannot view poll results until the poll is over.

[/ QUOTE ]

Cool idea, Lloyd.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, I'm smart. thanks. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[setter]

I was going to post something very similar to this on the 15th of February, since I am giving my girlfriend a Valentine's day present of me not playing online for the rest of the month and doing more things with her...but that I could still read 2+2 to learn more about poker. I think if we were to have a main topic once a week, in these areas would be great. I loved to get various viewpoints from people who are TAG, LAG and such. I would also like to post specific hands in the future regarding how to play against specific type of opponents such as loose & tight aggressive, calling stations, etc and also how to play specific hands against big stack, medium stack and short stacks as well as at various levels of MTT (bubble, early levels, final table etc.). I have been lurking for a while now and I see a lot of posters say to push, call or fold without it seems to thoughts against the style of player you are facing. Some of the good posters take this into consideration and in my development of my game I want to see how to play against all different types of player styles. I am hoping we could come up with a format that uses the converter allows more info to be put into a standard form, such as players left in tourney, bubble number, avg stack size at time, player images etc. to help with decisions. Many posters (rightfully so) have to ask for additional info after initial question has been asked by the original poster. Was wondering if we could get 2+2 to have a Hand Analysis Section made up just for this area. Thoughts?

[Lloyd]

bump

[morgan180]

bumpity

[SossMan]

argg..."stack depth and implied odds" got rivered. 2+2 is rigged!

[Lloyd]

[ QUOTE ]
argg..."stack depth and implied odds" got rivered. 2+2 is rigged!

[/ QUOTE ]
I actually found it pretty interesting that topics proposed by you and MLG got so little support. Could be how I worded it but there's some important concepts there. I'll get the post started either tonight or tomorrow. I'm sure implied odds/stack sizes will somehow be incorporated into the first thread since it plays a pretty significant role in determining early play.

Thanks to all who voted!

[morgan180]

[ QUOTE ]
argg..."stack depth and implied odds" got rivered. 2+2 is rigged!

[/ QUOTE ]

all polls are rigged [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[jslag]

[ QUOTE ]
why can't I see the results of the poll after I've voted? Who are the early winners?

[/ QUOTE ]

yah, i voted for that. surprised "Attacking, defending, and playing the blinds" got up there, since it's so frequently addressed here.

[Unparagoned]

Mmmm, perhaps I missed the posts coming out of this, but I sort of thought they'd be pretty obvious...and if not, well, this thread deserves a bit of a bump anyways [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]