Guy brags about having 3 accounts at Poker Stars - Page 3

Godfather80 · #1 12-25-2005, 03:33 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You're retarded.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, I'm not. It's not for bonus whoring, I don't even do bonii. I just don't like to keep my money in banks.

[/ QUOTE ]

This gets my vote for post of the year.

jman220 · #2 12-25-2005, 03:53 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You're retarded.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, I'm not. It's not for bonus whoring, I don't even do bonii. I just don't like to keep my money in banks.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, you're not retarded. You're clinically braindead.

daryn · #3 12-24-2005, 11:55 PM

i heard from someone that pokerstars is actually OK with people having multiple accounts.. is this true pokerstars?

KINGOFINLAND · #4 12-25-2005, 04:37 PM

Asked from the a while back if I could change my alias got this response:

Hello Axxx,

When you opened your PokerStars account, there was a message in the
dialog box stating the User ID would be displayed each time you play,
and cannot be changed once selected. Even though I understand your
reasons, to be fair to all players, we must enforce that rule equally for
everybody. I am sorry that we cannot accommodate your request.

If there is anything else I can help you with, please do not hesitate
to contact us.

Regards,

Matt
PokerStars Support Team

I have as well heard of some players who have several accounts at pokerstars, but they play high and do not whore the bonuses.

Emmitt2222 · #5 12-26-2005, 01:12 AM

I just wanted to say that at this moment the numbers are

Party - 53,500

Stars - 55,600

That's the first time I have ever, in the past 2 years, seen Stars overtake Party. I'm not sure if it's because of the new VIP program or what, but its very impressive. I still like Party for rakeback and ringgame play, yet at the same time I would rather pay rake to a site that has good customer service and seems to be run well. At the moment I'm still splitting my time, but before I never played Stars at all so they are doing things right at the same time Party is doing everything wrong.

imported_leader · #6 12-26-2005, 01:58 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I just wanted to say that at this moment the numbers are

Party - 53,500

Stars - 55,600

[/ QUOTE ]

It's happened a few times before that I've heard about.

[ QUOTE ]
I still like Party for rakeback and ringgame play, yet at the same time I would rather pay rake to a site that has good customer service and seems to be run well.

[/ QUOTE ]

At least at the levels I play 3/6 6m and 5/10 6m the rake is lower. So that's a little rakeback right there. If you add that to the VIP program, I think you would get something at least competitive especially for people that plan on getting the supernova fast. Plus PP and RB is sketchy. You're affiliate could get canned and then you'd have to find another one and close your account ect... At Stars the stuff is guaranteed pretty much. Those are just some of the factors I've been thinking about trying to choose between stars and party.

#7 12-27-2005, 04:22 PM

Thats cuz stars counts play-money. They aren't overtaking. Not even close.

Azizal · #8 12-27-2005, 05:04 PM

I declare this thread to be "Conjecture Fest" '06. And it's not even '06 yet.

DarkKnight · #9 12-27-2005, 05:21 PM

While Stars player count may get > PP's the game selection at low-mid stakes limit is absolute crap compared to PP. Right now there are like 5 3/6 tables at PP for every one at Stars.

That one fact alone is going to make it impossible for me to move from PP to Stars

imported_leader · #10 12-27-2005, 08:49 PM

[ QUOTE ]
That one fact alone is going to make it impossible for me to move from PP to Stars

[/ QUOTE ]

It makes you practice better table and seat section. I agree that it would be hard to find 4 great tables at one limit certain times of the day. That's why I'm splitting time between 3/6 and 5/10.