4 table video

[SpaceAce]

[ QUOTE ]
I love the use of note pad, pretyt funny.

Tough-ass call with the JJ, the 8 was a terrible card to come, but the call was correct in the end, very read dependent, and since you'd just started that was a hard one, good job.


[/ QUOTE ]

If you're talking about the hand early on where the guy turned out to be bluffing a busted gutshot, I think that was an easy call. Nothing about that hand smelled like an 8 to me. Getting > 2.5:1, I call there nearly every time unless I have specific read that says not to, not the other way around.

SpaceAce

[henrikrh]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I love the use of note pad, pretyt funny.

Tough-ass call with the JJ, the 8 was a terrible card to come, but the call was correct in the end, very read dependent, and since you'd just started that was a hard one, good job.


[/ QUOTE ]

If you're talking about the hand early on where the guy turned out to be bluffing a busted gutshot, I think that was an easy call. Nothing about that hand smelled like an 8 to me. Getting > 2.5:1, I call there nearly every time unless I have specific read that says not to, not the other way around.

SpaceAce

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm... I was thinking A8 was a VERY distinct possibility, A8s or somehting. And I think the hand he actually had shows that to be true, his hand was K9s I think, not far from A8 suited and easily in the same range, so if one is a possibility he could have played hte other the same imo. I'd call there too, but I would expect to lose 40% of the time, maybe people don't play their draws as agro at the lower stakes I play.

[2PAUL2]

an 8 was possible. so was a smaller pocket pair, a boat, a missed draw, a counterfeited 2 pair. ive induced a bluff by checking the turn as well an 100nl 6max is definetely more aggro than 25nl. i would expect to be ahead around 60% of the time there.

paul