Pokeroffice...Anyone know anything about this app?

Mempho · #1 08-23-2005, 04:03 PM

dibbs · #2 08-23-2005, 05:12 PM

I almost got it over PT a while back, I remember it was pretty easy to get free. I asked the opinion of this v. PT and I the feedback for PT was quite quite strong in comparison to PO, if I remember correctly.

sammy_g · #3 08-23-2005, 06:12 PM

I haven't tried PokerOffice yet, but is there any reason not to buy both PokerOffice and PokerTracker?

Any tool that helps you even a little bit quickly pays for itself...

Mempho · #4 08-24-2005, 09:51 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I haven't tried PokerOffice yet, but is there any reason not to buy both PokerOffice and PokerTracker?

Any tool that helps you even a little bit quickly pays for itself...

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know. I personally love PokerTracker and I think everyone else does, too. I just wonder if PokerOffice lacks or has any additional features.

ben_ · #5 08-24-2005, 10:32 AM

Pokeroffice is written in Java, making it the slowest piece of software ever.
I watched it take about 6 hours to import 10k hands.

langley11 · #6 08-24-2005, 01:50 PM

I switched to pokeroffice from PT a while back, it's really great during play, better than PT. If you change the database settings to MySQL it is very fast.

BigHobo · #7 08-24-2005, 05:43 PM

I've got both PT and PokerOffice. Poker Tracker is my main database for historical accumulation of data but PokerOffice's live tracker is extremely helpful.

Mempho · #8 08-25-2005, 02:13 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I've got both PT and PokerOffice. Poker Tracker is my main database for historical accumulation of data but PokerOffice's live tracker is extremely helpful.

[/ QUOTE ]

Tell me about the livetracker. Is this any better than PT/PA HUD combo?

68Mustang · #9 08-26-2005, 09:04 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I've got both PT and PokerOffice. Poker Tracker is my main database for historical accumulation of data but PokerOffice's live tracker is extremely helpful.

[/ QUOTE ]

Tell me about the livetracker. Is this any better than PT/PA HUD combo?

[/ QUOTE ]

Look at the lower left of this picture for the live stats.

tshak · #10 08-30-2005, 07:02 PM

I use PO with an older Athlon with only 512MB of RAM and I have over 30K hands (MySql backend) and it's easily as fast as PT.

Java, while not my first pref for a platform, has gotten a lot faster in modern versions. Most of the heavy lifting is done by the database anyway, so if you use MySql as opposed to the flat file system you should be fine.