|
|
#11
03-17-2005, 06:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Just nitpickin\'
[ QUOTE ]
not to mention cold calling 2 [/ QUOTE ] These are not cold. 
|
|
#12
03-17-2005, 06:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Just nitpickin\'
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] not to mention cold calling 2 [/ QUOTE ] These are not cold. [/ QUOTE ] I said that first. You're right, I almost always make this mistake of this when calling 2 after an initial limp/call [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
|
#13
03-17-2005, 06:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Too aggressive on the turn?
Um, does OP mean me?
I guessed the other players were holding various A's and K's or Q's with better (non-paired) kickers. I think KK and KQ were the real threats on the turn, and those were definitely possible (especially KK) which is why I was thinking (too late) that I should've slowed down on the turn. Seems like most people are more concerned with the pre-flop call and cold-call. Q6s is a hand that I would muck in most games for a single-bet, but I think it's playable for 1 bet with multiple callers. Maybe 3 isn't "multiple"... The cold-call was definitely more questionable but, being suited, I couldn't resist taking a shot at what figured to be a pretty big pot.
|
|
#14
03-17-2005, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Too aggressive on the turn?
OP = original poster and yes that means you. Everyone's concerned about the preflop play because the postflop play is self-explanatory.
I'd need a couple more callers to justify calling this one the first time around.
|
|
#15
03-17-2005, 09:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Too aggressive on the turn?
[ QUOTE ]
OP = original poster and yes that means you. Everyone's concerned about the preflop play because the postflop play is self-explanatory. I'd need a couple more callers to justify calling this one the first time around. [/ QUOTE ] I agree. I don't want to play in a raised pot (even if it only costs me one bet) with 3 players when all I am holding is Q6s.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
