#1
|
|||
|
|||
Conspiracy theorists rejoice
Anyone at my PokerNow table who's been window shopping for tinfoils hats is now firmly committed to purchasing:
Party Poker 0.50/1 Hold'em (10 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is MP3 with K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. <font color="CC3333">UTG raises</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="CC3333">UTG+2 3-bets</font>, MP1 folds, MP2 folds, <font color="CC3333">Hero caps</font>, CO folds, Button folds, SB calls, BB folds, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 calls. Flop: (21 SB) 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(5 players)</font> <font color="CC3333">SB bets</font>, UTG calls, <font color="CC3333">UTG+1 raises</font>, <font color="CC3333">UTG+2 3-bets</font>, <font color="CC3333">Hero caps</font>, SB calls, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 calls. Turn: (20.50 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(5 players)</font> <font color="CC3333">SB bets</font>, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 calls, Hero calls. River: (25.50 BB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(5 players)</font> <font color="CC3333">SB bets</font>, <font color="CC3333">UTG raises</font>, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 calls, Hero calls, <font color="CC3333">SB bets $2.25 (All-In)</font>, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 calls, Hero calls. Final Pot: 36.75 BB Results: SB has 8s 8c (full house, eights full of sevens). UTG has Ts Tc (full house, sevens full of tens). UTG+1 has Jh Jd (full house, sevens full of jacks). UTG+2 has Qs Qd (full house, sevens full of queens). Hero has Kd Kc (full house, sevens full of kings). Outcome: SB wins 36.75 BB. Amazingly, there was nothing whatsoever said in chat. God forbid someone's AA gets sucked out on, but this one just shoots on by. Martin |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Conspiracy theorists rejoice
I believe the hand happened, but it is tough to think that not one comment was made about it. For real, no one even made a peep?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Conspiracy theorists rejoice
were all the hands exposed? if not then i'm not as shocked by the lack of chat.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Conspiracy theorists rejoice
SB is a perfect example of why you dont want to sit short stacked, he missed out on some BB
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Conspiracy theorists rejoice
[ QUOTE ]
SB is a perfect example of why you dont want to sit short stacked, he missed out on some BB [/ QUOTE ] That was the first thing I thought of when I saw this hand too. Always rebuy when you have to. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Conspiracy theorists rejoice
Sorry, I thought the hand # would show up...first time using the converter:
1097745639 (pokernow) No one said a thing. Stranger than the hand itself [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Martin |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Conspiracy theorists rejoice
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, I thought the hand # would show up...first time using the converter: 1097745639 (pokernow) No one said a thing. Stranger than the hand itself [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Martin [/ QUOTE ] since SB put the last bet in, only his cards were shown, so its likely you were the only one who who checked the HH. Or the other person who did is like you and didnt say anything. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Conspiracy theorists rejoice
[ QUOTE ]
No one said a thing. Stranger than the hand itself [/ QUOTE ] If you play long enough you will see everything. When many people (all 2+2 members) play long enough at least some of them will see strange things often. And someone will post it as you did. Many people will never fight exactly such opposition at the same time, and probably you will not get there second time. But practically I'd suggest to give no-limit a try. There you have some chances to make lesser pocket pairs fold preflop or on flop in such circumstances. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Conspiracy theorists rejoice
[ QUOTE ]
But practically I'd suggest to give no-limit a try. There you have some chances to make lesser pocket pairs fold preflop or on flop in such circumstances. [/ QUOTE ] You missed the entire point of the post. Please re-read. Martin |
|
|