Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-18-2005, 02:56 PM
LearnedfromTV LearnedfromTV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Van down by the river
Posts: 176
Default Re: Winrate Theory

One problem with this "worst possible loss rate" concept is that it implies that whatever is true for 10/20 NL is also true for 10/20 limit. that is, the "worst possible player" as you define him would lose exactly the same at a limit table by sitting out every hand as at a NL table.

If that number made positive is the highest sustainable winrate in NL, why isn't it also the highest sustainable winrate in limit? Nothing in your analysis is particular to NL. I think it is just a coincidence that NL win rates are in the same neighborhood as the number you calculated.

The escalting blinds (6 BB/58BB) comparison quantifying the size of NL games relative to limit games is a good one, and germane to the winrate discussion, as is the size of mistakes your opponents tend to make.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-18-2005, 03:56 PM
not_da_nizzles not_da_nizzles is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 37
Default Re: Winrate Theory

It's very simple to come up with a strategy where you can sustainably lose more than 7.5PTBB/100. You have to play pretty badly to do it but it's not hard. (ie: fold all 'good' hands pre-flop, call-down or bet only when you have nothing)

mj
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.