#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is this just a math problem?
Villian is pushing any 2 here im very close to positive...
***** Hand History for Game 2266337083 ***** NL Hold'em $100 Buy-in + $9 Entry Fee Trny:13422832 Level:7 Blinds(150/300) - Sunday, June 26, 13:28:44 EDT 2005 Table Table 35019 (Real Money) Seat 7 is the button Total number of players : 4 Seat 3: semaj78 ( $4925 ) Seat 5: jljf3 ( $2744 ) Seat 6: mariopalmero ( $1415 ) Seat 7: Kirill137 ( $916 ) Trny:13422832 Level:7 Blinds(150/300) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to jljf3 [ 4s 3h ] mariopalmero folds. Kirill137 is all-In [916] semaj78 folds. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this just a math problem?
Doesn't matter a whole lot whether he goes with any two or not, considering you have 34o. It is pretty close to zero $EV-wise.
I'd probably fold regardless of the stack sizes of the other two players, but in this case, I would especially fold. Especially if big stack was aggressive, since if you lose, big stack will be able to mercilessly pwn the 3 of you. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this just a math problem?
The equity of 43o over a random hand - translated to odds - is 1:1.85 against.
You are getting 1:2.22 pot odds. To maximize your amount of chips, you should call. But I think with a relatively small (yet positive) EV (+80.59), you should fold anyway if you think you have enough edge over the field. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this just a math problem?
More psychological than a math problem when it's on the bubble. It really depends on how aggressive all the players are. The more aggressive they are, the more you should call.
|
|
|