Anybody really beating the new Party 30/60?

[Nightwish]

I've been playing the new Party 30/60 full time for about 3 weeks now. My winrate over 22,500 hands is a pathetic 0.89 BB/100. I was making 2.61 BB/100 over 100,000+ hands in the old Party 15/30. I'm obviously not happy with my 30/60 results.

I realize that I'm likely running bad, but just what kind of winrate is possible in this game? Is there anyone who has over 50,000 hands in this game already and is willing to share his results? Of course, the bigger the sample size the better.

[bicyclekick]

BRAGGER!

My winrate is about 1 overall in the new 30. I am on a nice 28k hand breakeven streak though. This game is a hard game, i don't care what anyone says.

A top player's rate would probably be 1.5-2 tops.

I aspire to 1.5

[Nightwish]

[ QUOTE ]
BRAGGER!

[/ QUOTE ]
[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] I wish there was something to brag about, but there isn't.

[ QUOTE ]

My winrate is about 1 overall in the new 30. I am on a nice 28k hand breakeven streak though. This game is a hard game, i don't care what anyone says.

A top player's rate would probably be 1.5-2 tops.

I aspire to 1.5

[/ QUOTE ]
Man, and there I was hoping that I could double my $/hand by playing the new 30/60.... The worst part is that there's no going back to the 15/30 now that all the LAGs have moved up.

[Turning Stone Pro]

All BS aside, I've done real well on the PP 30-60 since May 3 (around when all the new tables came in). I'm not sure what my BB/hr is, but I'd bet it's up there pretty good.

I'm like Nate, though, and after playing the Bellagio 80-160 and realizing how much I miss live play, my game on PP 30 has gotten admittedly sloppy.

I'm going to take a few days off and do some fishing.

TSP

[Nigel]

BK,

I think back in April you talked about still being unsure if you would keep the 15/30 as your regular game, although I imagine you are so immensely overrolled for 15/30 it's comical.

I am kind of surprised that I am seeing some of the long time 15/30 pros in the 15/30 still. OscarPGM comes to mind.

At any rate, this thread is depressing. I'd like to make the 30 my full time game, as I have only logged under 10k hands so far at the 20 and 30 combined, but it seems like the 15 might be almost as profitable without the brutal swings.

What are your thoughts on this these days?

Nigel

[bicyclekick]

Heh...as almost a mockery...I had a fantastic day playing today. Played 2k hands today at 5 different limits, 30/60 to 200/400 and the only one I lost at was party 30/60. I swear to god I hate that game.. I'll take running good at the higher limits any day, but it's just kinda sickly amusing that I luckbox every other game but can't catch a break in the 30.

There are plenty of not-good players in the 30, but the super donaters are not that easy to find. It's those guys that lead to inflated winrates.

Since you asked...I play the 30 when I can't get enough tables of higher games, which is pretty often.

[YoureToast]

[ QUOTE ]
I've been playing the new Party 30/60 full time for about 3 weeks now. My winrate over 22,500 hands is a pathetic 0.89 BB/100. I was making 2.61 BB/100 over 100,000+ hands in the old Party 15/30. I'm obviously not happy with my 30/60 results.

I realize that I'm likely running bad, but just what kind of winrate is possible in this game? Is there anyone who has over 50,000 hands in this game already and is willing to share his results? Of course, the bigger the sample size the better.

[/ QUOTE ]

Rolling...Only 10K hands but +8 BB/100.

[hockey1]

Only about 12,000 hands, but I'm well above 3BB/100. The deck's been hitting me in the face, but I'm also finding plenty of fish.

[Baulucky]

Nope.

[NMcNasty]

22,500 hands in 3 weeks means you're multitabling. Making .89/BB per 100 in the 30/60 is a great rate while multitabling, you really can't ask for more. If you say you made 2.61 BB/100 multitabling at the 15/30, well, I might have to be skeptical.