Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-22-2004, 02:02 AM
BBill BBill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 375
Default another .50/1.00 NL hand

In my journey up from .25/.50 NL to .50/1.00 NL I find I have a few small to moderate winning sessions and then I run into a play like this

.50/1.00 NL
I’m in the CO with 3 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (stack 80.00)

3 players in MP call
LP raises to 2.00
I call, everyone calls including the button, SB folds

Flop is 8 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

checked to LP who bets 2.00
I make a pot size bet of 15.00
The button smooth calls (stack 130.00, weak tight type of player, talks about how much he has won in the previous few days)
everyone else folds

Turn 5 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

the bet is to me

any suggestions before I post the results ?

thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-22-2004, 02:14 AM
gavrilo gavrilo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 442
Default Re: another .50/1.00 NL hand

You said tight however there are quite a few people in the pot here, if he thinks that someone else will come along after him if he's drawing to flush, he could be doing just that, might have something like A8 of spades.
I probably go all-n here
But from the sound of it, I'm guessing he had a higher set or 67 of spades
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-22-2004, 02:16 AM
muzungu muzungu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 196
Default Re: another .50/1.00 NL hand

Bill-

From the tone of your post I fear he flopped a bigger set (or hit with something stupid like A2/67/55), but I think normally you're ahead here, and you should fire again to charge possible spade draws (and for a value bet in general). You have $63 left, there is $50 in the pot, so I'd probably just push it all in. Your stack isn't nearly big enough to worry about getting away from set over set here, IMO.

-muz
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-22-2004, 03:00 AM
BBill BBill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 375
Default Re: another .50/1.00 NL hand

thanks,
Pushing it all-in was my first thought but I decided to play it differently
The pot was actually about 45.00
I bet just less than half pot, 20.00
button calls
River 10 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (no flush!) board is 8 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 5 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 10 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

I bet 15.00
Button calls

Button has 8 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

played right, wrong or indifferent ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-23-2004, 01:34 AM
YoJimbo YoJimbo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 22
Default Re: another .50/1.00 NL hand

I've always been hung up on decisions like this one myself. If it were me and I knew that the button was a pretty damn tight player, I would probably check it to him and make him show me his hand by the size of his bet. I can't say it's the best idea in the world, but I also can't see any reason in coming after him with a 1/2 pot bet and letting him slowplay a monster or let him stay on his draw with good odds. If you want to bet it, you gotta go all in due to the pot size and the fact that he may be in there on a draw.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-23-2004, 02:09 AM
BBill BBill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 375
Default Re: another .50/1.00 NL hand

Sounds like putting it all in on the turn would have been the right play. Considering that set over set does not occur that often I can see how this would be true.
tks
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-23-2004, 03:44 PM
RollaJ RollaJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,695
Default Re: another .50/1.00 NL hand

I don't know your bankroll situation but I can tell you how I did it when I first started playing online with a $50 deposit (I didnt trust the net or these virtual cardrooms for $100 when I first deposited). I would buy in to the $50 games on Paradise for $22 and leave the game when I got to $50-$75. I know it is not the ideal way to play, but if you are short rolled, but want the experience of playing the bigger game, buy in short and the only place to go is up.... After building a roll, start buying in for more and more till you have a nice roll, and you can buy in for and lose the max comfortably. Scared money is worthless at NL, dont play with it [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-23-2004, 06:39 PM
BBill BBill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 375
Default Re: another .50/1.00 NL hand

Actually that is a strategy that I have been considering for playing the 6-max NL games. I see people do well with it. If you can build the stack up to the usual buy-in it makes playing fearlessly much more natural.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-24-2004, 01:01 AM
tinker tinker is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: another .50/1.00 NL hand

[ QUOTE ]
thanks,
River 10 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (no flush!) board is 8 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 5 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 10 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

I bet 15.00
Button calls

Button has 8 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]



[/ QUOTE ]

He just calls the river bet??
If I read this right, you still have almost $30 left and he doesn't try for it?
I think for being in set-over-set situation, you are lucky not to go broke. Good information on this player, and a cheap lesson on the risks of low pairs.
Against most players, I would agree with all-in on turn, but I think you did fine here, and got lucky not to get broke in a bad spot.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-24-2004, 10:03 AM
RollaJ RollaJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,695
Default Re: another .50/1.00 NL hand

where do they offer 6max NL?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.