Streib article

[catlover]

I also liked this article a lot. But I think there is an area for possible improvement -- it could have gone above 10BB! From the solutions, it is obvious that a lot of hands should push with 10BB stacks. It stands to reason that a smaller, but still large, number of hands should push with (say) 15BB stacks. It would be helpful to have information on this.

[HesseJam]

Very good article, indeed. It is so good that I wished it had not been published. The last thing I need is this sort of information out in the public.

I am amazed that it hasn't been discussed a lot more.

[BarronVangorToth]

[ QUOTE ]
It is so good that I wished it had not been published.

[/ QUOTE ]


T3ch wants to be free.

Barron Vangor Toth
BarronVangorToth.com

[poincaraux]

The public seems not to care so much about this type of information.

[ QUOTE ]
The public seems not to care so much about this type of information.

[/ QUOTE ]

They would much rather talk about plants or how to play AA. Do you see why?

[SumZero]

It is interesting to compare this article to the one by Dennis Bragg called "Short Stack Play From the Small Blind". Bragg found that in HU if your opponent calls only with top 25% of the hands than you should push any two cards profitably (in terms of CEV). And he calculated the table for 50%, 75%, and 100% as well. The addition of changes in profitability in terms of $EV from the CEV and how that changes over time weren't in Braggs article and is a big benefit of this latest article (as everyone in STTF should know from various ICM posts and raptor challenge type posts).

Can I still find this Braggs' article?