Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: ATE articles any good?
no 6 37.50%
yes 10 62.50%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2005, 05:10 PM
Dopey Dopey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Proud To Be Losing 3BB/100
Posts: 65
Default Re: session review time again

I haven't heard back from the person reviewing my hands, but I accept the blame for that as I went away right after the pairings where made and only got a HH to him a few days ago.

I was more bothered by the fact that the person I was supposed to review never sent anything. Reviewing someones elses play was the main reason I signed-up for this, as I did a review post of one of Pokher's session and it made me think alot more about my game than I normally do.

I sent a PM, so I am in again. Hopefully I get matched up with someone who actually sends something this time.

Dopey [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2005, 05:30 PM
Guruman Guruman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 228
Default Re: session review time again

Hey Dopey,

If you'd like a spare session to review and want to see me tilt at a wild table, check out this session.

Those opponents will keep you up nights. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-16-2005, 05:49 PM
Dopey Dopey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Proud To Be Losing 3BB/100
Posts: 65
Default Re: session review time again

Guruman,

Can't access the session, I guess because i don't have a gmail account. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

I sent a PM if you want to e-mail it to me I'd be interested in taking a look.

Dopey [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-16-2005, 05:54 PM
POKhER POKhER is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: .50/1 At Stars - LONDON, UK.
Posts: 590
Default Re: session review time again

If anyone here wants to do a "Sweat for a sweat" then post hands we disagree on, on this forum that'd be much better than going through 200 hands.

I find sweats far more interesting. Also help note taking and keep me concentrating aswell as learning more.

Anyone interested? Preferably play above or at $1/2 6max - AIM is: POKhERLH - Anyone can add me [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Thought i'd post it here rather than spam the board.

Numeri i pmed you [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-16-2005, 06:12 PM
Dopey Dopey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Proud To Be Losing 3BB/100
Posts: 65
Default Re: session review time again

Pokher,

Explain your "Sweat for Sweat" idea, I might be interested.

Dopey [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-16-2005, 07:36 PM
Peter Harris Peter Harris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Posts: 113
Default Re: session review time again

sweat for sweat

i sweated ads for 2 hours last week. He's done 45mins of sweat for me. Having a 2+2er over your shoulder stops you fecking up at the tables. Peers make peeps nervous.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-16-2005, 09:59 PM
POKhER POKhER is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: .50/1 At Stars - LONDON, UK.
Posts: 590
Default Re: session review time again

[ QUOTE ]
Pokher,

Explain your "Sweat for Sweat" idea, I might be interested.

Dopey [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

If you get on AIm or MSN - Ill just type myhands to you as we play and you can say "bet" "fold that hes got you beat". "Ah2c" "AcAc RIGGED".

Then we argue over folding it and both think we're right so post on 2+2 and then we get an answer... then 2+2ers argue about it and think they're both right. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

1hour for 1hour. I play with my cash, you watch... you play your games and ill watch.

This has got to be more "stakes" suited i think though as aggression of at 20/40 game(Extreme example) will probably make a 1/2 player fold a hell of alot for example.

Anyhow i'm at .5/1 for partys bonus then back to 1/2 for a bit and some 2/4 at pacific [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

If your interested, PM Me - Or whoever is at your stakes that you want to do this with.

Numeri Why not do this once a month, and each week the reviewers who get paired up send eachother a session. After that month they switch to a new reviewer.

1 week trial, then they must re-arrange it if they hate their reviwer(no hard feelings).

Hows it sound?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-16-2005, 10:25 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: session review time again

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Pokher,

Explain your "Sweat for Sweat" idea, I might be interested.

Dopey [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

If you get on AIm or MSN - Ill just type myhands to you as we play and you can say "bet" "fold that hes got you beat". "Ah2c" "AcAc RIGGED".

Then we argue over folding it and both think we're right so post on 2+2 and then we get an answer... then 2+2ers argue about it and think they're both right. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

1hour for 1hour. I play with my cash, you watch... you play your games and ill watch.

This has got to be more "stakes" suited i think though as aggression of at 20/40 game(Extreme example) will probably make a 1/2 player fold a hell of alot for example.

Anyhow i'm at .5/1 for partys bonus then back to 1/2 for a bit and some 2/4 at pacific [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

If your interested, PM Me - Or whoever is at your stakes that you want to do this with.

Numeri Why not do this once a month, and each week the reviewers who get paired up send eachother a session. After that month they switch to a new reviewer.

1 week trial, then they must re-arrange it if they hate their reviwer(no hard feelings).

Hows it sound?

[/ QUOTE ]

Pokher- I really like this idea of having it go on 4x during a month, but this only works if the reviewer is paired up with the reviewee and not a daisy chain where i review a, c reviews me, d reviews c, etc etc. But I do like this idea. Can we do this numeri? Please?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-16-2005, 10:25 PM
kidcolin kidcolin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boston to Sacramento
Posts: 120
Default Re: session review time again

I missed the first one, and I'm going to have to miss this one since I'm going back to Sassachusetts for Christmas. But this is a great idea and I don't know how I missed it last time around.

I like the level splitting idea. I'd be happy reviewing a 3/6er's play.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.