Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-19-2005, 06:16 AM
ilikebigbets ilikebigbets is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 12
Default u2

i don't get them as a band, i don't like their music and bono is relatively difficult for me to look at for some reason... what am i missing? Also feel the same way about Bruce Springsteen but I know some ppl who agree w/ that one.

ilikebigbets
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-19-2005, 08:02 AM
EricOF EricOF is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 31
Default Re: u2

Some Good tunes up until Achtung Baby. All downhill since then. No other band has as inflated an opinion of their own importance as U2, though that's probably all about Bono.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-19-2005, 08:29 AM
lucas9000 lucas9000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 103
Default Re: u2

u2 are incredibly overrated. they made some great music in the 80s, but since then they've done nothing all that good imo. i mean let's be honest here...joshua tree was their last good album. it just boggles my mind that anyone still pays attention to them.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-19-2005, 10:10 AM
razor razor is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1
Default Re: u2

It's music... some people connect with it, some people don't.

If you're into their music you get to listen to it, buy the CDs, watch the videos and see the concents. If you don't like it you get to ignore them...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-19-2005, 10:23 AM
swede123 swede123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 366
Default Re: u2

I agree with the previous posters. At this point it seems every song they make sounds exactly the same. They've become mainstream pop pretty much. The Joshua Tree kicks ass though.

Swede
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-19-2005, 10:29 AM
Chris Daddy Cool Chris Daddy Cool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 401
Default Re: u2

generally i like U2 but not in the same way I like The Beatles for instance.

translated "I don't think they're bad, I like some of their songs, but they're not great or anything."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-19-2005, 10:45 AM
Bluffoon Bluffoon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 184
Default Re: u2

[ QUOTE ]
i don't get them as a band, i don't like their music and bono is relatively difficult for me to look at for some reason... what am i missing? Also feel the same way about Bruce Springsteen but I know some ppl who agree w/ that one.

ilikebigbets

[/ QUOTE ]

Good band went soft.

Starving poor artists seem to me to create much better music than fat rich artists.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-19-2005, 11:05 AM
stigmata stigmata is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 118
Default Re: u2

Yeah, some really good stuff in the early 80's. Listen to the "War" album, its incredibly powerful music. Politically charged with the anger of youth. It is still important and relevant, and has stood the test of time.

Once they made the $ and chilled out, it was impossible for them to keep doing great stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-19-2005, 11:16 AM
istewart istewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baseball Preview Issue
Posts: 2,523
Default Re: u2

U2 rules. Saying they haven't done anything good since the Joshua Tree is a bit of a general statement. Achtung Baby was a great album, and All That You Can't Leave Behind was fairly good as well (my opinion, of course). Between 91-01, aside from 2 very mediocre albums, they really didn't make anything. It's not like they were pumping out bad album after bad album.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-19-2005, 11:30 AM
lucas9000 lucas9000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 103
Default Re: u2

[ QUOTE ]
U2 rules. Saying they haven't done anything good since the Joshua Tree is a bit of a general statement. Achtung Baby was a great album, and All That You Can't Leave Behind was fairly good as well (my opinion, of course). Between 91-01, aside from 2 very mediocre albums, they really didn't make anything. It's not like they were pumping out bad album after bad album.

[/ QUOTE ]

it's not general at all. i'm being quite specific in that every album after the joshua tree has not been good. nothing general about it...that statement represents a finite, identifiable group of albums.

imo they have been pumping out bad album after bad album after joshua tree, but that's just my opinion.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.