|
|
#22
12-08-2005, 12:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
TREVOR
all of my analysis of this hand is specefic to THIS PARTICULAR HAND...i believe that calling a pf raiser who is in the SB heads up with 22 is not a winning play for this particular player...this is my guess...again a ton depends on what range of hands he puts the villian on and what he does when he doesn't flop a set.
but, yeah, rush to PT for all your answers... 
|
|
#23
12-08-2005, 12:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] b/c 22 gets set over setted more often then others? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah...if he puts villian on a pocket pair with his preflop raise then that's definitely a factor to consider...also how far will villian go with a pair after the flop if he too doesn't flop a set. All points that need to be considered [/ QUOTE ] I have 203 22-44 hands that saw a flop. I have ONE instance of set over set. You're right, cleary a PF fold.
|
|
#25
12-08-2005, 12:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TREVOR
[ QUOTE ]
all of my analysis of this hand is specefic to THIS PARTICULAR HAND...i believe that calling a pf raiser who is in the SB heads up with 22 is not a winning play for this particular player...this is my guess...again a ton depends on what range of hands he puts the villian on and what he does when he doesn't flop a set. [/ QUOTE ] This is a great situation. PP vs guy in the sb who is raising like he has a big pair. A decent leak for a lot of people is defending their sb with 22-44 vs a solid lag who is stealing on the button.
|
|
#26
12-08-2005, 12:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.
[ QUOTE ]
I have 203 22-44 hands that saw a flop. I have ONE instance of set over set. [/ QUOTE ] Trevor, you are leaving something out of this statistic. I'll let you think about then once you tell me we can start rushing to conclusions. [ QUOTE ] You're right, cleary a PF fold. [/ QUOTE ] I never said it was "clear" fold. But, yes, I am right for this hand.
|
|
#27
12-08-2005, 01:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I have 203 22-44 hands that saw a flop. I have ONE instance of set over set. [/ QUOTE ] Trevor, you are leaving something out of this statistic. I'll let you think about then once you tell me we can start rushing to conclusions. [ QUOTE ] You're right, cleary a PF fold. [/ QUOTE ] I never said it was "clear" fold. But, yes, I am right for this hand. [/ QUOTE ] No PF raise I assume is the arguement. The line has to be drawn somewhere. Quit being a metaphysical [censored]. Tis the season!
|
|
#28
12-08-2005, 01:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TREVOR
[ QUOTE ]
all of my analysis of this hand is specefic to THIS PARTICULAR HAND...i believe that calling a pf raiser who is in the SB heads up with 22 is not a winning play for this particular player...this is my guess...again a ton depends on what range of hands he puts the villian on and what he does when he doesn't flop a set. but, yeah, rush to PT for all your answers... [/ QUOTE ] You've got position on him and only have to call 3bbs. This is a 100% autocall and you can take that to the bank, literally. Trevor, if you even have to think about this you are playing way too tight.
|
|
#29
12-08-2005, 01:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TREVOR
[ QUOTE ]
You've got position on him and only have to call 3bbs. This is a 100% autocall and you can take that to the bank, literally. Trevor, if you even have to think about this you are playing way too tight. [/ QUOTE ] I'm the one advocating calling WTF!
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
