Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-05-2005, 01:58 AM
mike l. mike l. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: oceanside, california
Posts: 2,212
Default three hands against one maniac

80 live against a psyhco lady who clearly just gambles up laggy constantly from several hands ive seen. she loves to openraise whenever it's folded to her and loves to bet whenever checked to regardless of her cards. she has strong when weak tells with her betting.

hand 1 i get KdTd in hijack, she openraises, i 3 bet, she calls. the flop is Qd7h3c. she checks, i bet, she checkraises real strong/fast like. i call. the turn is 6d. she bets, i call. the river is a 4h. she bets, i call.

hand 2 a generally sort of tight mediocre guy openraises from hijack, she 3 bets, i call in the bb w/ Ad2d planning to bet most flops. raiser calls. 3 of us. the flop is Kh9d3c. i bet, hijack folds, she calls. the turn is Ts. i decide to check-call her down regardless of what comes. i check, she obliges and bets, i call. the river is an 8c, i check-call.

hand 3. i get 6c4c in the bb. she openraises on the button i call. the flop is 6h5d2d. i checkraise, she 3 bets, i 4 bet. im planning to put at least 12 bets in on the flop, but she just calls. the turn is a Q. i bet, she raises, i call. the river is a K, i check-call.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-05-2005, 02:47 AM
Jules22 Jules22 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: three hands against one maniac

[ QUOTE ]
im planning to put at least 12 bets in on the flop

[/ QUOTE ]

fresh like misted lettuce [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-05-2005, 05:00 AM
Ian J Ian J is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 37
Default Re: three hands against one maniac

Is this for real? Hands 1 and 2? In hand 2, what do you beat? In hand 1, if you're that determined, raise the river or something, she may fold KJ.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-05-2005, 05:46 AM
obi---one obi---one is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 21
Default Re: three hands against one maniac

i really think you should raise the turn in hand one. and check it behind if you miss.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-05-2005, 06:13 AM
soah soah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 112
Default Re: three hands against one maniac

[ QUOTE ]
i really think you should raise the turn in hand one. and check it behind if you miss.

[/ QUOTE ]

It sounds like this player will bet the river.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-05-2005, 06:00 AM
oreogod oreogod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Irregular, Regular
Posts: 405
Default Re: three hands against one maniac

I pretty much play these the same way as u, given your read. Only exception, Hand 1...think about popping turn. I mean, if she is really that crazy to 3bet with a worse hand, then call down.

Hand 2, I like the c/c approach from the turn and on, as she will raise a decent amount of air, while almost never taking the free card.

Hand 3 preflop -- I like the move. Close imo. Id have no idea what Id do until the action got to me. Postflop is good though.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-05-2005, 01:23 PM
andyfox andyfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,677
Default Re: three hands against one maniac

A player who will bet nearly 100% of the time when checked to should be called down often. So I think blackjacks, A-xs, and K-Q go up in value against this type of player. But K-T and 6-4 are trouble hands.

In hand 1, the raise-the-flush-draw-on-the-turn ploy works much less than it used to, as you and others have pointed up here before. I think I prefer not to raise the turn, since she'd then not put you on a flush if you happen to get there on the river and you could make oodles of bets.

On hand 3, I don't understand why you would want to put "at least 12" bets in on the flop. Just too many ways to get turned or rivered. Or maybe I just misunderstand the meaning of your post title. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-05-2005, 10:12 PM
mike l. mike l. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: oceanside, california
Posts: 2,212
Default Re: three hands against one maniac

hand 3: "Just too many ways to get turned or rivered."

but so many more ways to win the pot with my pair of 6s. not putting in a lot of bets with my hand here against someone willing to competely overplay as little as one overcard is an error.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-05-2005, 11:58 PM
shemp shemp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 401
Default Re: three hands against one maniac

Maybe this is weak tight thinking, but if she'd go 12 bets with a single overcard on a 632 board, doesn't that make her call of your flop 4 bet pretty scary?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-06-2005, 12:07 AM
mike l. mike l. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: oceanside, california
Posts: 2,212
Default Re: three hands against one maniac

"but if she'd go 12 bets with a single overcard on a 632 board"

how can someone know for sure if she would, but im saying that she might. as much as some of you will try to insist otherwise, my read of this player was solid and if she kept going i wouldve kept going and i wouldve been right to.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.