A simple question : for those who want to outlaw abortion

QuadsOverQuads · #1 07-11-2005, 10:11 PM

How do you propose to enforce such laws?

q/q

[censored] · #2 07-11-2005, 10:27 PM

How was it enforced prior to roe v.wade?

superleeds · #3 07-11-2005, 10:32 PM

It wasn't. A lot more women had to seek proper medical attention for botched abortions tho. Some even died.

[censored] · #4 07-11-2005, 10:39 PM

[ QUOTE ]
It wasn't. A lot more women had to seek proper medical attention for botched abortions tho. Some even died.

[/ QUOTE ]

than that is how it would be enforced now. I feel no responsiblity to make breaking a law easier. thus breaking a law prohibiting abortions should incur a risk.

QuadsOverQuads · #5 07-11-2005, 10:49 PM

[ QUOTE ]
How was it enforced prior to roe v.wade?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ineffectively. Do you intend to change that?

q/q

[censored] · #6 07-11-2005, 11:02 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How was it enforced prior to roe v.wade?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ineffectively. Do you intend to change that?

q/q

[/ QUOTE ]

Ineffetively explain?

How are any laws enforced? Why would abortion be different. Essentially once the crime is discovered it is investigated, tried, and punished.

QuadsOverQuads · #7 07-11-2005, 11:10 PM

[ QUOTE ]
How are any laws enforced?

[/ QUOTE ]

(So, I take it that you reeeeeeally don't want to directly answer my question?)

[ QUOTE ]
Why would abortion be different.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because the "crime" in this case is the termination of a pregnancy. For the state to determine whether such a crime is being committed, it must, presumably, begin to monitor women's pregnancies (so that it can determine which ones have been illegally terminated). Do you dispute this?

q/q

[censored] · #8 07-11-2005, 11:15 PM

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
How are any laws enforced?

[/ QUOTE ]

(So, I take it that you reeeeeeally don't want to directly answer my question?)

[ QUOTE ]
Why would abortion be different.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because the "crime" in this case is the termination of a pregnancy. For the state to determine whether such a crime is being committed, it must, presumably, begin to monitor women's pregnancies (so that it can determine which ones have been illegally terminated). Do you dispute this?

q/q

[/ QUOTE ]

that would be one way but since it is unlikely that is what the people would want it is mostly just a scare tatic used by people who are afraid of allowing the people to decide

in reality law enforcement would investigate and prosecute those who perform the abortions. this would be done with evidence as in the case of all crimes.

zaxx19 · #9 07-12-2005, 01:01 AM

No, not at all. The crime would be the deletion of human life. The fact that "tracking" that life would be harder in the case of abortion than in the case of Nicole Simpson shouldnt matter.

E.G. The murder of small children might be harder to detect also....logically does that mean we cant legislate laws in order to protect small children?

fimbulwinter · #10 07-12-2005, 04:46 AM

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
How are any laws enforced?

[/ QUOTE ]

(So, I take it that you reeeeeeally don't want to directly answer my question?)

[ QUOTE ]
Why would abortion be different.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because the "crime" in this case is the termination of a pregnancy. For the state to determine whether such a crime is being committed, it must, presumably, begin to monitor women's pregnancies (so that it can determine which ones have been illegally terminated). Do you dispute this?

q/q

[/ QUOTE ]

you're an idiot. we prosecute all crimes based on evidence of their commission, not based on monitoring possible victims. we don't have everyone sign in every day to ensure they aren't murdered, yet somehow homicide dets get the job done.

I have never once heard anything intelligible or logical out of you quads. you are the ideal liberal.

fim