Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-25-2005, 11:12 PM
dfan dfan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 62
Default Re: Percentage of Online Winners, Revisited Yet Again

I don't know, but I rate your icon a 10!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-25-2005, 11:32 PM
crazy canuck crazy canuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto canada
Posts: 657
Default Re: Percentage of Online Winners, Revisited Yet Again

I believe Multipoker stated that 10% of all players are long term winners and 20% of swedish are. Damn, they got thos hot chicks and spend all that time in front of their computers.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-26-2005, 12:54 AM
teamdonkey teamdonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: where am i?
Posts: 247
Default Re: Percentage of Online Winners, Revisited Yet Again

[ QUOTE ]
You weren't paying attention. I said 40% was a reliable estimate of the "winning" players in a PT database, where winning only means being up for a short span of hands. Or have you found that only 5% of the player in your PT are + $?

[/ QUOTE ]

my (smallish) PT database:

players who have won money: 37.7%
hands dealt to players who have won money: 51.9%

That second number is somewhat skewed since 11% of those hands were dealt to one person (me), but even without me it's at 46%. I think that number more accurately answers the question of "at a random table how many people are winning and how many losing?".
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-26-2005, 01:31 AM
UncleDuke UncleDuke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 61
Default Re: Percentage of Online Winners, Revisited Yet Again

[ QUOTE ]
You say the definition isn't that important to you but let's take your question as an example of why a precise definition is absolutely required. You say "What I really want to know is if I sit down at an average table, how many people in the game with me are winning players?" I assume you mean +EV vs -EV players since you want to know how many fish there are. So here are the players at your table:

[/ QUOTE ]

Also, there's a major distinction between someone being a "+EV" player in that he's odds on to win in the long run *in the games he plays* and a +EV player at a given table, where you've put certain people together.

For instance, I believe I'm a +EV player in the games I usually play (at least my results have been positive overall), but if you sit me down at a table with nine bigtime pros, then I'm surely -EV for that situation. Against the usual crowd in an average low-stakes game on Party, I'm a reasonably good player. Against Johnny Chan, Phil Ivey, etc, I'm a very large fish.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-26-2005, 01:35 AM
PokerCat69 PokerCat69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 257
Default Re: Percentage of Online Winners, Revisited Yet Again

If someone joined all the pokersites on bonuswhores and just hopped from site to site to clear reloads, they could be playing slighty -EV poker, but turn a nice profit overall due to the bonues.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.