|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Da Vanci Code - Cheap Writing
Okay so everyone who has read this book has recommeneded it so I figured I'd give it a try. I was a little deterred when I read the back cover though, "Louvre has been brutally murdered... police have found a series of baffling codes... As Langdon and a gifted French cryptologist, Sophie Neveu..." and put the down book for a couple of weeks, read a couple of really great books and now just came back to read it. My instincts were of course right all along, this book sucks.
"brainy thriller" is probably written about 200 times in the reviews of this book on the inside pages but this book is brainy in only a very superficial sense. The same with "grand pere" who is supposedly so brillant. All his cool codes seem clever to me, but necessarily seem like the mark of a genius. My main complaint of this book is that it sucks. It's really gimmicky cheap writing. Take for example the code they need to unluck the little cryptoplex or whatever the hell it's called, the code says he needs to find a giant orb this is missing from Newton's tomb. "Thus far, Jacques Sauniere had proven himself a meticulous code writer, and Langdon had to believe this his final password would prove to be not only symoblically fitting but also crystal clear. If this solution were anything like the others it would be painfully obvious when it dawned." NO [censored] [censored]. And it talks about how Langdon is looking outside at trees and can't think up what the answer to the riddle is, I get the feeling that Dan Brown is trying to make the reader figure out what the answer to this riddle is before he says just so the reader feels smart. Or how about Sopheu Neveau. Her grandfater was like a father to her and they had a great relationship for 15 years and then she sees him doing something which makes her never speak to him again. What do you think that something is? I figured she saw him raping 20 little boys at once. No, all he was doing was having sex with someone. What the [censored]?? This book goes at the same "thriller" pace for the entire 600 pages. How can someone be excited for that entire time? I wasn't. In conclusion this book sucks . BTW if you haven't read this book yet and I ruined some of the "mysteries" in this book for you, thank me because this book is a waste of time. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Da Vanci Code - Cheap Writing
[ QUOTE ]
My main complaint of this book is that it sucks. [/ QUOTE ] ha, i like it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Da Vanci Code - Cheap Writing
haha.. i like this post.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Da Vanci Code - Cheap Writing
whoa.. same opinion, posted at the same time. nice.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Da Vanci Code - Cheap Writing
I might be able to take your critique of his "cheap writing" a little more seriously if you didn't use the word sucks and expletives several times. Before you critizice other people's writing, how about you learn to be more eloquent yourself.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Da Vanci Code - Cheap Writing
</font><blockquote><font class="small">In risposta di:</font><hr />
I might be able to take your critique of his "cheap writing" a little more seriously if you didn't use the word sucks and expletives several times. Before you critizice other people's writing, how about you learn to be more eloquent yourself. [/ QUOTE ] i hear you, but his point was clearly made. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Da Vanci Code - Cheap Writing
One does not have to be held to the same standard as what they are criticizing.
That's like saying I can't tell Ashlee Simpson that she sucks just because I am a worse singer. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Da Vanci Code - Cheap Writing
[ QUOTE ]
I might be able to take your critique of his "cheap writing" a little more seriously if you didn't use the word sucks and expletives several times. Before you critizice other people's writing, how about you learn to be more eloquent yourself. [/ QUOTE ] What's wrong with "sucks"? And expletives (or as I heard them described once, "deletives")? The use of them is not de facto bad writing. That position is just linguistic snobbery. And by the way, you should have put "sucks" in quotation marks in your post. Also, "why don't you" would be a little more elegant that "how about you" in your last sentence. It's the fu[/i]cking internet, for God's sake. Lighten up. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Da Vanci Code - Cheap Writing
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I might be able to take your critique of his "cheap writing" a little more seriously if you didn't use the word sucks and expletives several times. Before you critizice other people's writing, how about you learn to be more eloquent yourself. [/ QUOTE ] What's wrong with "sucks"? And expletives (or as I heard them described once, "deletives")? The use of them is not de facto bad writing. That position is just linguistic snobbery. And by the way, you should have put "sucks" in quotation marks in your post. Also, "why don't you" would be a little more elegant that "how about you" in your last sentence. It's the fu[/i]cking internet, for God's sake. Lighten up. [/ QUOTE ] F*ck off you stupid f*ckin c*nt rag |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Da Vanci Code - Cheap Writing
lol
you've tried writing at "our level" but it changes nothing |
|
|