Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-06-2005, 01:40 PM
Wynton Wynton is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 18
Default Re: 3-betting as opposed to folding situations

But ckessel, one of my questions specifically was directed to 3-betting a weak/tight player, when we know the blinds will fold. So under your reasoning, why are we 3-betting there with just J10s of the hands I originally mentioned?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-06-2005, 02:03 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 3-betting as opposed to folding situations

[ QUOTE ]
But ckessel, one of my questions specifically was directed to 3-betting a weak/tight player, when we know the blinds will fold. So under your reasoning, why are we 3-betting there with just J10s of the hands I originally mentioned?

[/ QUOTE ]

JTs is a candidate because I think it's less likely to be dominated than a K, Q, or weak Ax hand. JTs also has more potential to flop a made hand or draw, while KTo or A8s is less likely to flop a good draw and any pair you hit is very suspect to domination. JT is suspect as well, but I don't think as suspect as a A, K or Q against a weak-tight raiser.

And you can't assume the blinds will fold. You can hope, but if one of them has a hand, they'll come along. JTs is more flexible if a blind calls or raises. If you 3 bet A8s and a blind calls, there's a damn good chance he also dominates your Ace. JTs may be dominated, but it plays multiway better than A8s will.

Again though, I think 3-betting any of the hands is usually bad, even on a weak-tight raiser. If I was going to pick one of the hands to occasionally make a move with though, it'd be JTs.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-06-2005, 02:05 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 3-betting as opposed to folding situations

What do you guys think of 3-betting pps? I like to do it a LOT. I know that they probably dont have equity by themselves but they play so good in position. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-06-2005, 02:09 PM
Wynton Wynton is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 18
Default Re: 3-betting as opposed to folding situations

As I mentioned earlier, I feel that pocket pairs of 88 and up are easy 3-bets at most tables. 77 and 66 feel borderline against unknowns.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-06-2005, 02:12 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 3-betting as opposed to folding situations

Yeah I 3-bet 88 easily but I meant like isolating with 44-55. I have done it a couple of times recently and I feel quite comfortable with it if you have a somewhat decent image(ie they have to believe you only do this with AK,TT or something).
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-06-2005, 04:04 PM
sthief09 sthief09 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem (mets are 9-13, currently on a 1 game winning streak)
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: 3-betting as opposed to folding situations

[ QUOTE ]
I fold them all. Domination sucks.

Guy.

[/ QUOTE ]


but position and initiative do not
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-06-2005, 04:07 PM
Spicymoose Spicymoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 146
Default Re: 3-betting as opposed to folding situations

[ QUOTE ]

If the ones I mentioned before were clear folds, then how do people feel about 3-betting with AJo, A10s, A10o, KQo and 77 (with the lineup I mentioned before)?

[/ QUOTE ]

I 3-bet all of these hands pretty often, but not always. Sometimes I fold them if the raiser is too tight, and in an early position. Err, 77 I never fold.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-06-2005, 04:13 PM
krishanleong krishanleong is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 45
Default Re: 3-betting as opposed to folding situations

[ QUOTE ]
I fold them all. Domination sucks.

Guy.

[/ QUOTE ]

Same.

Krishan
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-06-2005, 04:18 PM
Wynton Wynton is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 18
Default Re: 3-betting as opposed to folding situations

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I fold them all. Domination sucks.

Guy.

[/ QUOTE ]


but position and initiative do not

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't tease me Josh. Are you suggesting that you might 3-bet any of those hands in the op?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.