Sweet Hand (NC)

[gildwulf]

I'm slumming at pokerstars 6-tabling 3/6 until I figure out the whole party thing.

Enjoy!

************************************************** ***
PokerStars Game #2804453436: Hold'em Limit ($3/$6) - 2005/10/14 - 19:56:15 (ET)
Table 'Aunus' Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: pokarmastar ($152 in chips)
Seat 2: Aeichele ($83 in chips)
Seat 3: Gildwulf ($341.50 in chips)
Seat 4: aZnBoi997 ($179 in chips)
Seat 5: Chic N Stu ($190 in chips)
Chic N Stu: posts small blind $1
pokarmastar: posts big blind $3
Aeichele: posts big blind $3
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Gildwulf [3h 3d]
Aeichele: checks
Gildwulf: calls $3
aZnBoi997: folds
Chic N Stu: calls $2
dreamfire joins the table at seat #6
pokarmastar: checks
*** FLOP *** [6d 4d 2d]
Chic N Stu: checks
pokarmastar: checks
Aeichele: checks
Gildwulf: bets $3
Chic N Stu: calls $3
pokarmastar: folds
Aeichele: folds
*** TURN *** [6d 4d 2d] [5d]
Chic N Stu: checks
Gildwulf: bets $6
Chic N Stu: calls $6
*** RIVER *** [6d 4d 2d 5d] [7d]
Chic N Stu: bets $6
Gildwulf: raises $6 to $12
Chic N Stu: raises $6 to $18
Gildwulf: raises $6 to $24
Betting is capped
Chic N Stu: calls $6
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Gildwulf: shows [3h 3d] (a straight flush, Three to Seven)
Chic N Stu: shows [9s 8d] (a straight flush, Four to Eight)
Chic N Stu collected $76 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $78 | Rake $2
Board [6d 4d 2d 5d 7d]
Seat 1: pokarmastar (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: Aeichele folded on the Flop
Seat 3: Gildwulf showed [3h 3d] and lost with a straight flush, Three to Seven
Seat 4: aZnBoi997 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: Chic N Stu (small blind) showed [9s 8d] and won ($76) with a straight flush, Four to Eight

[Justin A]

What the hell is with your preflop limp?

[gildwulf]

1) everyone at table is super loose-passive, especially with blinds
2) I have almost no fold equity versus blinds and UTG
3) very low likelihood of being raised
4) limping would not be standard in my game, except for these 3 conditions

[Justin A]

[ QUOTE ]
1) everyone at table is super loose-passive, especially with blinds
2) I have almost no fold equity versus blinds and UTG
3) very low likelihood of being raised
4) limping would not be standard in my game, except for these 3 conditions

[/ QUOTE ]

I apologize I completely missed the UTG poster. That's what you get for posting this impossible to read hand history. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Are we supposed to treat this situation with the bottom end of a straight flush like having the king in a 4-flushed board?

[gildwulf]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
1) everyone at table is super loose-passive, especially with blinds
2) I have almost no fold equity versus blinds and UTG
3) very low likelihood of being raised
4) limping would not be standard in my game, except for these 3 conditions

[/ QUOTE ]

I apologize I completely missed the UTG poster. That's what you get for posting this impossible to read hand history. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Heheh, np.

You should treat a lower straight flush like what it is: holy [censored] wtfbbq it's a straight flush.

[johnny005]

for some reason i think no... its a 1 outer