which has weaker players at NL50?

BigBiceps · #1 12-16-2005, 02:41 AM

in full ring.

Isura · #2 12-16-2005, 02:44 AM

I would say full tilt. But there are a lot of annoying short-stacks, even up to the 200 level.

PoBoy321 · #3 12-16-2005, 04:15 AM

It depends on what you mean by "weaker." I think that UB's players are more weak/tight, FT's are more LAG.

GimmeDaWatch · #4 12-16-2005, 04:24 AM

Dunno, FT players are tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight in my experience, too many bonus whores, but I havent played there in about 6 months.

BigBiceps · #5 12-16-2005, 08:29 PM

People are literally giving their money away at FullTilt, commiting their whole stack with top pair etc.

sawseech · #6 12-16-2005, 09:10 PM

i think ub is easier

View Poll Results: Is keeping them worse than illegally DL music?
Yes	18	32.73%
no	37	67.27%
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll