Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-14-2005, 11:49 PM
FoxwoodsFiend FoxwoodsFiend is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Haven
Posts: 248
Default Re: GIGABET.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
And if Antonius made anything close to a standard sized reraise, calling with 75off to see a flop was a poor play.


[/ QUOTE ]

There is no way you can say that, it's totally false. When you're a LAG you cannot just roll over every time somebody plays back at you. At least, not in anything more advanced than $33 Party SnG's.

[/ QUOTE ]

I can't believe everybody's knocking AcesHigh as some sort of idiot for pointing out that calling a reraise with 57o is a bad play. It just swells the pot and it's almost a certainty that the only way you're winning the pot is by bluffing, which will now be VERY expensive and also very risky because your reraising opponent would have to not get a piece of the flop. In other words, that's a lot of chips to risk later on in the hand on the off chance your opponent has nothing AND misses the flop when you could just fold your 57. LAGs can't profitably be run over. And they also can't profitably call every time they're reraised. I would say 57o is on the "fold" end of that spectrum.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-15-2005, 12:00 AM
Jbrochu Jbrochu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 51
Default Re: GIGABET.

[ QUOTE ]
I can't believe everybody's knocking AcesHigh as some sort of idiot for pointing out that calling a reraise with 57o is a bad play.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't call him an idiot, just expressed my opinion that his statement was wrong. Without knowing the table dynamics, reads, possible tells, etc. his statement that the call was bad is just plain false.




[ QUOTE ]
LAGs can't profitably be run over. And they also can't profitably call every time they're reraised. I would say 57o is on the "fold" end of that spectrum.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed that normally it's a fold, but maybe this guy had played back at him once or twice and he let the hands go?

The statement "if Antonius made anything close to a standard sized reraise, calling with 75off to see a flop was a poor play" is false without knowing the entire situation.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-15-2005, 12:04 AM
PickyTooth PickyTooth is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10
Default Re: GIGABET.

they're playing with really deep stacks. Calling a reraise with it isn't bad at all. Even if all it could do is please shania
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-15-2005, 12:38 AM
Fallen Hero Fallen Hero is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 34
Default Re: GIGABET.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
And if Antonius made anything close to a standard sized reraise, calling with 75off to see a flop was a poor play.


[/ QUOTE ]

There is no way you can say that, it's totally false. When you're a LAG you cannot just roll over every time somebody plays back at you. At least, not in anything more advanced than $33 Party SnG's.

[/ QUOTE ]

I can't believe everybody's knocking AcesHigh as some sort of idiot for pointing out that calling a reraise with 57o is a bad play. It just swells the pot and it's almost a certainty that the only way you're winning the pot is by bluffing, which will now be VERY expensive and also very risky because your reraising opponent would have to not get a piece of the flop. In other words, that's a lot of chips to risk later on in the hand on the off chance your opponent has nothing AND misses the flop when you could just fold your 57. LAGs can't profitably be run over. And they also can't profitably call every time they're reraised. I would say 57o is on the "fold" end of that spectrum.

[/ QUOTE ]

they are (were) #1 and #2 in chips
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-15-2005, 12:46 AM
ekw ekw is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 2
Default Re: GIGABET.

It doesn't work that way.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-15-2005, 12:47 AM
UMTerp UMTerp is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 26
Default Re: GIGABET.

UPDATED CHIP COUNT AS OF 11:45 EST (per Pokerwire):
Blinds 5K/10K, 1K ante

Place Poker Player Chip Count
1 Patrik Antonius $ 980,000
2 Joe Cassidy $ 905,000

3 James Van Alstyne $ 820,000
4 Darrell Dicken $ 808,000
5 Brad Booth $ 670,000
6 Ron Kirk $ 660,000
7 Adam Friedman $ 655,000
8 Doyle Brunson $ 595,000

9 Joanne 'J.J.' Liu $ 590,000
10 Phil Laak $ 565,000
11 Eskimo Clark $ 540,000
12 Mike Gracz $ 510,000
13 Frank Vizza $ 480,000
14 Bengt Sonnert $ 460,000
15 David Levi $ 440,000
16 Peter Costa $ 430,000
17 Barny Boatman $ 420,000
18 Jeff Rine $ 400,000
19 Joe Sebok $ 390,000
20 Brian Lamkin $ 360,000
21 Loi Phan $ 350,000
22 Dwayne Moyers $ 330,000
23 Jeff Littlefield $ 326,000
24 Woody Van Stratum $ 320,000
25 Davood Mehrmand $ 300,000
26 Jesse Jones $ 270,000
27 Rehne Pedersen $ 260,000
28 Kermit Beasley $ 259,000
29 Marco Traniello $ 240,000
30 Dennis Waterman $ 220,000
31 Barry Greenstein $ 210,000
32 Rod Hurlbut $ 200,000
33 Glynn Beebe $ 200,000
34 Steve Rassi $ 170,000
35 Mads Andersen $ 145,000
36 Jeff King $ 125,000
37 Jason Song $ 125,000
38 Don Zewin $ 112,000
39 Michael Yoshino $ 103,000
40 Noah Jefferson $ 100,000
41 Terri Evanowski $ 95,000
42 Ray Sanchez $ 94,000
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-15-2005, 01:33 AM
ismisus ismisus is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: GIGABET.

Gigabet is a genius, because many people do not understand when to play (7 5) and make it EV+ for a particular situation
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-15-2005, 03:11 AM
TheMainEvent TheMainEvent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 544
Default WOW

Joe Cassidy just called a 200K raise from Antonius after leading 120K with A7 high on a 965QJ board and his hand was good. I am speechless.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-15-2005, 03:14 AM
Autocratic Autocratic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: D.C.
Posts: 128
Default Re: WOW

[ QUOTE ]
Joe Cassidy just called a 200K raise from Antonius after leading 120K with A7 high on a 965QJ board and his hand was good. I am speechless.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll never be a great poker player.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-15-2005, 03:25 AM
flatline flatline is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: WOW

With the board showing 9s-6d-5d-Qh-Jh on the river, Joe Cassidy bets $120,000 into a $500,000 pot, and Patrik Antonius raises to $320,000. Cassidy makes an incredible call with Ad-7c (ace high). Sure enough, Antonius shows Ah-3d, and Cassidy's kicker plays to win the entire pot.

Joe Cassidy is our new chip leader with approximately $1.45 million, while Antonius is down to $500,000.

>>>>>>>>

unreal
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.