Pokertracker BB/100 for 600 NL players

[SuperJez]

I am unsure if 600 NL qualifys for mid-high stakes...I doubt it but I think it is ok to post it here anyway...

What are the average/pretty good/excellent BB/100 pokertracker stats for 600 NL hold em? I have 30,000 hands logged and although this isnt a massive sample it is certainly enough to give me a fair idea of what I can expect, however I have nothing to judge myself against. I am not asking what anyones results in particular are, nor am I going to brag about or berate myself, I just want to know what you lot think is a "good" rate...an "ok" rate and a "superb" rate.

Cheers,

Jez

[kagame]

ive got 10k hands at full ring 600NL

my stats are 22/11/10

for the 6 MAX ive got stats of 30/17/12 but thats only 2k hands


not sure if this is sustainable...but i put people on crazy monkey tilt so maybe

[SuperJez]

Hi kagame,

Thanks for your reply mate. Apologies if I seem stupid here but I have only just got hold of pokertracker, the stat that I was looking to have a "middle winning ground" to judge against (BB/100) is just a single figure like 2.6 or 5.3 or something - what is your rate for the 10max games if you dont mind me asking? and what are those stats you have related in your previous post? Would be interested to hear others opinions as well..thanks again for the reply.

Jez

[Yeti]

kagame is referring to VPIP / PFR / BB/100.

[SuperJez]

Thanks for the clarification Yeti [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

kagame - nice one dude u are a better player than me!

Jez

[kagame]

i think youd need something like 200k hands to really establish a semi-verifiable win rate...

[iceman5]

[ QUOTE ]
i think youd need something like 200k hands to really establish a semi-verifiable win rate...

[/ QUOTE ]

200K? Lets not get carried away. Maybe if youre a serious LAG.

[kagame]

semi-lag