Jennicide, hot or not?

[chet]

Versus the general public she's pretty good.

Versus all of the pigs that you normally see playing poker, she's a 10.

[slickpoppa]

[ QUOTE ]
when she was *ahem* 17

[/ QUOTE ]
17! This just keeps getting better and better. Giggity Giggity!

[slickpoppa]

[ QUOTE ]
I guess I'm in minority here, but I say not. Not ugly either, by any means, but hot? No. Evelyn Ng is hot.

[/ QUOTE ]
Are you joking? Have you looked closely at Ng's face? If Ng is your benchmark for hotness, then jennicide is definitely hot and then some.

[rdavey]

No, not joking. Just an opinion. And she is not my benchmark, not even close.

[nothumb]

I have a question, how is this a 'rhetorical' question? Are you attempting to point out that the internet is a breeding ground for bizarre and uncomfortable discussions?

Well, I'm game.

Jennicide: Nice looking girl and surprisingly patient. In other words, won't last long around here.

Can't do the dreadlocks though. Why, Jenni? Just a personal prejudice.

Gavin: Didn't know he posted here. Not up on the gossip, I guess. Hey, I'm all for it.

NT

[Tiltzilla]

Bunch of them at neverwinpoker.com
[image]http://www.neverwinpoker.com/images/jennicide/iheartjamie3[1].jpg[/image]

[slickpoppa]

anyone else see the e-mail she sent to the site:
Bryan (micon),

> For the general understanding of how the courts proceed with copyright
> law, I will explain. According to Lexis Nexis:


> "You do not need to apply or
> register to have a copyright; you receive copyright protection when you
> create the work...The instant you use your pencil, typewriter or
> computer to produce something original it is subject to copyright
> protection provided it is a copyrightable subject matter."


> Examples of work that already have copyright protection include:


> (1) literary works
> (2) musical works, including any accompanying words
> (3) dramatic works, including any accompanying music
> (4) pantomimes and choreographic works
> (5) computer databases
> (6) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works
> (7) motion pictures and other audiovisual works
> (8) architectual works
> (9) sound recordings


> Please forward this information to your attorney. I do believe in
> this situation, my "copyright" is witheld in the sixth category.
> As stated clearly in copyright law, "Contrary to the wording, however,
> whether materials are public has no relationship to whether they fall
> into the Public Domain. This mistaken notion has somehow led many to
> believe that everything on the Internet is public and therefore in the
> Public Domain and thus freely usable without permission. This is
> completely false.(1)"


> I have clear documentation of copyright law regarding internet
> procedure that states: "The URL address is copyright protected. And if
> someone uses an image they own as a link to their site, it too is
> copyright protected...You will have to have permission to use an image
> from a site if you wish to add a link to that site at your own site.
> You can add links to any site without permission though, just don't use
> their image for the link." For example just putting a link to
> http://jenn1c1de.tripod.com is found to be legal, however, posting
> images from that URL is found to be illegal.


> Nevertheless, whether or not something is "fair use" is rarely a clear
> yes or no question. It requires review of case law and the above
> factors by an experienced attorney who can assess the level of risk
> involved in the proposed use.


> After reviewing the material that is provided above, please consider
> this as a warning for I am fully prepared to take legal action in this
> matter. I am submitting my final and second request to remove
> these pictures from http://www.neverwinpoker.com. Please feel
> free to have your attorney contact me or my attorney in advance to
> court proceedings. If you need my attorney's information, I would
> be more than happy to provide it.


> Yours truly,


> Jennifer

Jen, nice job if you actually wrote this. A lot better than the crap many of my fellow law students could produce.

[Ulysses]

[ QUOTE ]
Jen, nice job if you actually wrote this. A lot better than the crap many of my fellow law students could produce.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nice try.

[slickpoppa]

[ QUOTE ]
Nice try.

[/ QUOTE ]
What is that supposed to mean?

[lucas9000]

[ QUOTE ]
According to Lexis Nexis:

Jen, nice job if you actually wrote this. A lot better than the crap many of my fellow law students could produce.

[/ QUOTE ]

your fellow law students don't know better than to cite to lexis nexis as legal authority? frightening.

/nerd