|
|
#11
11-29-2005, 07:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low PP + Gutshot then 1card OESD: I wanted to bet the turn.
[ QUOTE ]
So given the passivity, knowing that it will be a 3-handed pot, is it even worth calling with 22-66 in the BB with one mp limper and a button raise if it's just for set value? [/ QUOTE ] preflop you're getting 7:1 on a call, and you're about 9:1 to flop a set and win. With implied odds this is an easy call pf from the BB 
|
|
#12
11-29-2005, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Low PP + Gutshot then 1card OESD: I wanted to bet the turn.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] So given the passivity, knowing that it will be a 3-handed pot, is it even worth calling with 22-66 in the BB with one mp limper and a button raise if it's just for set value? [/ QUOTE ] preflop you're getting 7:1 on a call, and you're about 9:1 to flop a set and win. With implied odds this is an easy call pf from the BB [/ QUOTE ] duh. thanks. this thin edges stuff is new to me. easy call when I know I can win 100bbs [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
|
|
#13
11-29-2005, 07:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Low PP + Gutshot then 1card OESD: I wanted to bet the turn.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I just noticed there is no section in SSHE on playing like an aggro nutjob versus button steals. Tightening up in the blinds now and I think its going to lower my variance big time and save a lot of bets. [/ QUOTE ] "Steals" are often just raises with pretty solid hands that they happened to pick up in position. I wait until I see evidence that he's a stealer before considering any sort of aggro blind defense. Remember that players at these levels are generally too passive. [/ QUOTE ] So given the passivity, knowing that it will be a 3-handed pot, is it even worth calling with 22-66 in the BB with one mp limper and a button raise if it's just for set value? [/ QUOTE ] Yes
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
