|
|
#21
10-25-2005, 07:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: World Series Game 3
OK...i backed off of Houston....
The roof is open just too much bs going the sox way. 
|
|
#22
10-25-2005, 08:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: World Series Game 3
[ QUOTE ]
CWS are going off at +164 at pinny. i'm very very tempted. I'll post my plays once i actually make them. [/ QUOTE ] I took 'em elsewhere at +171. Down 1-0 right now but still like my odds. Naj
|
|
#23
10-25-2005, 09:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: World Series Game 3
[ QUOTE ]
. My main concern is that pinnacle is offering the best line on the White Sox - which USUALLY means that they are not that good a bet. Well, Pinny deducts so little juice in baseball that its not that big a deal. Other sports, I agree 100%. [/ QUOTE ] I agree - except for the fact that the Astros had the WORST price at Pinnacle. Now that would be unusual if the White Sox were the right side of the line.
|
|
#24
10-25-2005, 09:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: World Series Game 3
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] . My main concern is that pinnacle is offering the best line on the White Sox - which USUALLY means that they are not that good a bet. Well, Pinny deducts so little juice in baseball that its not that big a deal. Other sports, I agree 100%. [/ QUOTE ] I agree - except for the fact that the Astros had the WORST price at Pinnacle. Now that would be unusual if the White Sox were the right side of the line. [/ QUOTE ] what books are you comparing this line against? i didn't do much looking around, but pinnys small hold would make it hard for them to have both the worst and best to offer (simultaneously of course) The nature of baseball and the betting publics refusal to realize that its not a emotinal team sport (hoops/foots/hockey) makes it virtually impossible for houston to be the right side in this spot. the books will always shaed towards the favorite before they even release the line, then its going to be bet up regardless of what they post (within reason). all this, you know of course. i just like typing!
|
|
#25
10-25-2005, 09:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: World Series Game 3
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] . My main concern is that pinnacle is offering the best line on the White Sox - which USUALLY means that they are not that good a bet. Well, Pinny deducts so little juice in baseball that its not that big a deal. Other sports, I agree 100%. [/ QUOTE ] I agree - except for the fact that the Astros had the WORST price at Pinnacle. Now that would be unusual if the White Sox were the right side of the line. [/ QUOTE ] what books are you comparing this line against? i didn't do much looking around, but pinnys small hold would make it hard for them to have both the worst and best to offer (simultaneously of course) The nature of baseball and the betting publics refusal to realize that its not a emotinal team sport (hoops/foots/hockey) makes it virtually impossible for houston to be the right side in this spot. the books will always shaed towards the favorite before they even release the line, then its going to be bet up regardless of what they post (within reason). all this, you know of course. i just like typing! [/ QUOTE ] It's not that hard to have the best and the worst line. The best is for the CWS, and the worst is for the Astros. I only looked at 4 books, though (Pinnacle, WSEX, Bowman's, Sports Interaction) - but the Pinnacle line was far off the others. They had it at +172/-180 while the others were in the +155-160/-170 -175 range.
|
|
#28
10-25-2005, 09:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: World Series Game 3
[ QUOTE ]
so did you lay off them? i hope so homie! [/ QUOTE ] yes, for once I laid off the losing side of a bet. Well at least sort of. Now that I said this the White Sox will probably come back and win.
|
|
#29
10-25-2005, 10:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: World Series Game 3
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] so did you lay off them? i hope so homie! [/ QUOTE ] yes, for once I laid off the losing side of a bet. Well at least sort of. Now that I said this the White Sox will probably come back and win. [/ QUOTE ] heheheheh, my master plan!
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
