#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results
I'm a bit confused. Are you saying that villian's UTG push is +EV? Or is my repush +EV? Are you running hand ranges
through a program? Secondly, why do you say UTG is a horrible player? He's shortstacked and the blinds are soon to go up. How can pushing be so bad at a "tight" table regardless of what your two cards are? Retrospectively I don't think anyone played the hand poorly. UTG had the right of first vigorish. He had a halfway decent hand and pushed. I was relatively shortstacked and I suspected he was making a play at the pot. Would I make this play at a $30 table, I don't know? But with this being a $500 table, I felt like I was able to make a better read and act accordingly. Thanks for the responses. Bruce |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results
[ QUOTE ]
$525 turbo on Stars. I'm a bit confused. Are you running hand ranges through a program? [/ QUOTE ] tell me you're kidding. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $525: Reraising or Folding with ATo?
[ QUOTE ]
A random player theoretically finishes ITM 30% of the time. Bruce [/ QUOTE ] In practice, significantly less than 30% of the time. That's why good players make money, even with the vig. But whatever. You obviously have no real interest in anyone's feedback. This is really just a brag post of how you made a "great" (actually bad) call of a "great" (actually bad) push. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results
[ QUOTE ]
When you run this through SNGPT it really depends a lot on what UTG's range is. At 22+,A2s+,A3o+,KTs+,KJo+,QJs - calling becomes positive 0.7%. [/ QUOTE ] I can't see UTG having that wide of a range. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $525: Reraising or Folding with ATo?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] A random player theoretically finishes ITM 30% of the time. Bruce [/ QUOTE ] In practice, significantly less than 30% of the time. That's why good players make money, even with the vig. But whatever. You obviously have no real interest in anyone's feedback. This is really just a brag post of how you made a "great" (actually bad) call of a "great" (actually bad) push. [/ QUOTE ] While I don't think Bruce made this call for the right reasons (no offence but most of Bruce's posts indicate a lack of understanding of some important sng concepts), I think you (pineapple) should read my latest post explaining how both plays are actually quite defendable. It wasn't my first instinct either. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results
I thought this result was interesting, so set about verifying it myself, and I came up with the same answer regarding Q9 suited. It appears to me to be definately +EV, regardless of what assumptions one makes about the strength of hand one would call with.
Regarding calling with ATo it looks to me like it is a -EV call if one assumes the all-in guy has a better hand than Q9 suited. However, if one assumes the all-in guy would move in with a hand as bad as Q9 suited, then the call becomes +EV. |
|
|