Call for Stats: W$SD, W$WSF

[Justin A]

So far it's looking like you're right at 2/4 and higher, but the micro limits seem to be skewing things. Since the game is so loose it seems like even high W$SD numbers still correspond fairly low W$WSF numbers.

[dogmeat]

This year's $5/$10 stats (I can't believe I'm winning with these as I've seen so many beats at the end I can't believe it - seems like I never drag the pot)

37K hands W$WSF 33.7 - W$SD 52.51

Dogmeat [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

[bicyclekick]

This year:

78k hands with 7 or more players 15/30 and up:
42 w$wsf
38 wtSD
57 W$SD

I've ran good this year.

From the whole DB:
150,000 hands
w$wsf: 39.6
wtsd 37
w$sd 56

[bigmac366]

[ QUOTE ]
w$wsf: 39.6

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm almost 10 points lower than this, anyone know what that means? sample size 30K hands at 1/2.

[AviD]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
w$wsf: 39.6

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm almost 10 points lower than this, anyone know what that means? sample size 30K hands at 1/2.

[/ QUOTE ]

It means you aren't winning as often as he is when you are seeing flops (i.e. playing a hand).

[bigmac366]

i know what its definition is. i'm wondering if theres a simple explanation for its cause, or if it means i have a helluva lotta holes in my game.

[SmileyEH]

[ QUOTE ]
i know what its definition is. i'm wondering if theres a simple explanation for its cause, or if it means i have a helluva lotta holes in my game.

[/ QUOTE ]

Some is running bad, some is not being as good.

-SmileyEH

[bicyclekick]

I also play in games where players fold more than your players postflop. That's gotta account for something.

[LoaferGee12]

28,602 hands with at least 7 players at 1/2.
W$WSF: 31.97
W$SD: 57.83

[bigmac366]

[ QUOTE ]
I also play in games where players fold more than your players postflop. That's gotta account for something.

[/ QUOTE ]

makes sense. in the micro FAQ, btspider said the typical micro players W$WSF was 28-32%.