Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2005, 06:49 PM
guyincognito210 guyincognito210 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 16
Default 22 vs. suited connectors

i was at cardplayer's poker odds calculator and i ran 22 vs suited connectors. JT fairs slightly better than 9T and 9T fairs slightly better than 89. none of these hands share a straight with 22? i ran them all not sharing any suits. only thing i came up with is having a higher card on a two pair board. meaning you would win instead of split with JT on a board of AAKKT whereas with 98 or 9T you would split. is this the only difference or is there another? i know this is negligible but i was just wondering anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2005, 06:55 PM
trumpman84 trumpman84 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: 22 vs. suited connectors

That, and just think of any hand where you would play the board except for your kicker. A board like AAAAT, the JT would play. Or like an underfull..there are slightly more boards where trips get negated by a higher 3 of a kind such as 99AAA would be a split with 98 wheres TT777 would not be a split with JT. Or on a board with a 5 flush, there is less of a chance of all five flush cards being above a 9 of that suit than there is all five flush cards being above a 7 of that suit. These are all very very little things, but they all add up to make the slight differences you see.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-02-2005, 07:00 PM
guyincognito210 guyincognito210 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 16
Default Re: 22 vs. suited connectors

top notch
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-2005, 08:04 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 22 vs. suited connectors

Pre-flop hand showdowns are not transitive in all cases (thus not transitive).

In other words, just because A->B and B->C doesn't mean A->C.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2005, 02:07 AM
ohnonotthat ohnonotthat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Jersey - near A.C.
Posts: 511
Default Excellent point

Totally non-responsive but still an excellent point. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

He asked why 9-8 is a lesser favorite over 2-2 than T-9 is [over 2-2] and why J-T is a bigger fav. over 2-2 than T-9 is.

As it turns out he (almost) answered his own question; the only times higher is better is when the board shows two pair (or quads); when this happens, J-T will beat 2-2 more often than the two lower connectors will.

Note that changing 2-2 to 5-5 is an improvement in two ways - more [1-card] straights AND more wins when the board shows two pair (or a full house).

Having taken a cheap shot at MasterLJ allow me to now give him his due; he is 100% correct.

"Rock-paper-scissors" is common in holdem.

2-2 beats AK/off, A-K/off beats J-T and J-T beats 2-2

This is even more pronounced in multi-way match-ups.

You'll frequently see hand "A" be a fairly significant favorite over "B" and "C" but become worthless with the addition of [a fourth hand] "D" or [a 5th hand] "E".

Q-T is a sizable favorite over 5-4 and 2-2 but the addition of A-Q makes Q-T almost worthless and the further addition of A-T (which itself is in horrible shape) leaves Q-T with barely a prayer.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.