Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-22-2005, 10:53 PM
MaxPower MaxPower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Land of Chocolate
Posts: 1,323
Default Passively Played Pair of Kings

Is this a good line here? UTG+1 is TAG, MP2 is very LAG.

PartyPoker - $15/$30 Texas - 9 players (Converter: PGC)

Hero is MP3 with K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

PreFlop
<font color="blue">UTG folds</font>, <font color="red">UTG+1 RAISES</font>, <font color="green">MP1 Calls</font>, <font color="green">MP2 Calls</font>, <font color="red">Hero RAISES</font>, <font color="blue">CO folds</font>, <font color="blue">Button folds</font>
<font color="blue">SB folds</font>, <font color="blue">BB folds</font>, <font color="red">UTG+1 RAISES</font>, <font color="green">MP1 Calls</font>, <font color="green">MP2 Calls</font>, <font color="green">Hero Calls</font>

(4 players) FLOP: A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ( Pot Size: 8.83 BB )
<font color="red">UTG+1 BETS</font>, <font color="blue">MP1 folds</font>, <font color="green">MP2 Calls</font>, <font color="green">Hero Calls</font>

(3 players) TURN: 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ( Pot Size: 10.33 BB )
<font color="green">UTG+1 checks</font>, <font color="green">MP2 checks</font>, <font color="green">Hero checks</font>

(3 players) RIVER: A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ( Pot Size: 10.33 BB )
<font color="green">UTG+1 checks</font>, <font color="red">MP2 BETS</font>, <font color="green">Hero Calls</font>
<font color="green">UTG+1 Calls</font>
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-22-2005, 10:59 PM
Justin A Justin A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: I travel the world and the seven seas
Posts: 494
Default Re: Passively Played Pair of Kings

I don't like your turn check. You've got the best hand a good majority of the time with that action and you'll get value from other pocket pairs.

I think you should raise the river and hope UTG+1 calls two cold with his pocket pair.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-22-2005, 11:01 PM
sfer sfer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 806
Default Re: Passively Played Pair of Kings

I think UTG+1 has to call with QQ/JJ less than never to make raising less profitable than calling on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-22-2005, 11:14 PM
MaxPower MaxPower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Land of Chocolate
Posts: 1,323
Default Re: Passively Played Pair of Kings

[ QUOTE ]
I think UTG+1 has to call with QQ/JJ less than never to make raising less profitable than calling on the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

Can you phrase that in English?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-23-2005, 12:12 AM
casinogosain casinogosain is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Posts: 1
Default Re: Passively Played Pair of Kings

[ QUOTE ]
I think UTG+1 has to call with QQ/JJ less than never to make raising less profitable than calling on the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

By that you mean that a river raise is more profitable than a call even if UTG+1 never calls (e.g. always profitable)?

-Ash
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-23-2005, 12:53 AM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: Passively Played Pair of Kings

im not saying you played this hand bad, im just saying you obviously won this pot, and it wasnt that big...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-23-2005, 01:05 AM
lil feller lil feller is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 66
Default Re: Passively Played Pair of Kings

[ QUOTE ]
I don't like your turn check. You've got the best hand a good majority of the time with that action and you'll get value from other pocket pairs.

I think you should raise the river and hope UTG+1 calls two cold with his pocket pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

What are you putting MP2 on. Hero said he was "very lag", does that mean its impossible for him to cold call twice with a raggy ace? I'd be considering two things on the turn, before deciding to bet. The first is how likely I think it is that MP2 has some junky ace (wouldn't we expect him to 3 bet PF with a good one, or with a pocket pair?) and whether or not I think he was "slowplaying" on the flop, and is trying to check raise me on the turn.

Secondly, and related to the first, can I fold to a c/r? If not, because this guy is so lag, i like the check. If I had JJ, it'd be different, but there aren't any river cards i've really all that scared of here.

Raising the river seems equally risky. The TAG isn't calling 2 with most hands (especially since our turn check screams MONSTER), and is LAG is bluffing he'll fold.

What am I missing?

lf
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-23-2005, 02:00 AM
DpR DpR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 76
Default Re: Passively Played Pair of Kings

I like betting the turn, and I'm not folding to a raise from MP2. I cam understand the logic of a turn check (although mine might be different from yours), but then the river is a must raise.

Bottom line here is I am not afraid of an Ace at all after then both check this turn. Not that it is terrible for UTG to check this turn with AK, but I am not playing the hand as if he has that since it is uncommon.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-23-2005, 02:10 AM
Nigel Nigel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 736
Default Re: Passively Played Pair of Kings

[ QUOTE ]

What am I missing?

lf

[/ QUOTE ]

Nothing, IMO. I'm with you - good analysis.

Nigel
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-23-2005, 03:00 AM
Justin A Justin A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: I travel the world and the seven seas
Posts: 494
Default Re: Passively Played Pair of Kings

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't like your turn check. You've got the best hand a good majority of the time with that action and you'll get value from other pocket pairs.

I think you should raise the river and hope UTG+1 calls two cold with his pocket pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

What are you putting MP2 on. Hero said he was "very lag", does that mean its impossible for him to cold call twice with a raggy ace? I'd be considering two things on the turn, before deciding to bet. The first is how likely I think it is that MP2 has some junky ace (wouldn't we expect him to 3 bet PF with a good one, or with a pocket pair?) and whether or not I think he was "slowplaying" on the flop, and is trying to check raise me on the turn.

Secondly, and related to the first, can I fold to a c/r? If not, because this guy is so lag, i like the check. If I had JJ, it'd be different, but there aren't any river cards i've really all that scared of here.

Raising the river seems equally risky. The TAG isn't calling 2 with most hands (especially since our turn check screams MONSTER), and is LAG is bluffing he'll fold.

What am I missing?

lf

[/ QUOTE ]

The way the action played out it's very unlikely that either opponent has an ace. We can fairly safely put UTG1 on TT-QQ, and since it was UTG1 that bet the flop, it's very unlikely that MP2 would check the turn after he checks if he did have an ace.

That's also why I like the river raise. UTG1 will have a very tough time laying down QQ or JJ even for two bets on that river.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.