OT: A football puzzle

[lorinda]

Do American scoreboards typically have only two digits? If so 99-99 would be the "right" answer (unless someone can show that 98 or 97 are harder to land on)

Lori

[Toro]

Mr. Moderator, what's the penalty for the OP for stringing along over a hundred posters without giving an answer? This is intolerable!

[The Yugoslavian]

[ QUOTE ]
Mr. Moderator, what's the penalty for the OP for stringing along over a hundred posters without giving an answer? This is intolerable!

[/ QUOTE ]

Did you read the thread? He acknowledged the correct answer. It's 4-4.

Yugoslav

[bluefeet]

His "answer" is here within the thread: [ #3387420 - 09/12/05 05:14 PM ]

[Toro]

[ QUOTE ]

His "answer" is here within the thread: [ #3387420 - 09/12/05 05:14 PM ]

[/ QUOTE ]

My bad, missed it.

[kyro]

[ QUOTE ]
Do American scoreboards typically have only two digits? If so 99-99 would be the "right" answer (unless someone can show that 98 or 97 are harder to land on)

Lori

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, some have 3 digits. But the hundreds digit is only in the shape of a 1. So the answer would be 199-199.

[Pudge714]

[ QUOTE ]


3) Rather than going through the whole snapper, holder, kicker thing for a FG or PAT, the ball can be direct snapped to the kicker who can bounce the ball off the ground and attempt to kick it through. (Drop kick - this is insanely difficult)



[/ QUOTE ]
Obviously you are not a rugby fan

[Pudge714]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Do American scoreboards typically have only two digits? If so 99-99 would be the "right" answer (unless someone can show that 98 or 97 are harder to land on)

Lori

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, some have 3 digits. But the hundreds digit is only in the shape of a 1. So the answer would be 199-199.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why would it be 199 because then any score greater than 200 would be 199 on the score board wouldn't it?

[Scuba Chuck]

I'll go with 4 to 2.

[bearly]

11 to 5