Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-14-2005, 04:25 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: $33 vs. $22 on Party

I know it will not be easy, but going to go full steam and see how long I last. I plan on going to Thailand for vacation in February and want to have plenty of money.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-14-2005, 04:38 AM
ilya ilya is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Party Poker
Posts: 460
Default Re: $33 vs. $22 on Party

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
4k a month is definitely impossible 8-tabling without methamphetamines.

[/ QUOTE ]

I almost hate to, but...FYP. Are you kidding me? Even 8-tabling continuously, say you get in 11/hour (I've only ever played in sets, is this close to accurate?). That still comes out to over 12 hours of poker per day, every day (no breaks on weekends). As much as I do enjoy playing poker, I think I'd rather clean up human feces with my bare hands than do this.

[/ QUOTE ]

$1000 says I can do it in January.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-14-2005, 05:12 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: $33 vs. $22 on Party

anyone playing 22's on party right now? i am grinding, gf just baked cookies, could life be any better.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-14-2005, 07:06 AM
SammyKid11 SammyKid11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 401
Default Re: $33 vs. $22 on Party

If I had an accurate way of verifying that you:
a) Played 4k SnG's in one month
b) Never played more than 8 tables at a time
c) Didn't play specifically to fit the $1000 bet (ie- you play the 6's and play super-aggressively to where you either win or bust out early on so as to open a new table)
d) Didn't use any kind of drug to aid you along the way...

...then I'd take the bet. I think you'd go mad before you'd play 4k SnG's, all in your normal style, all without doing more than 8-tabling, all without any pharmaceutical aid, in one month. Seriously...12+ hours a day, continuously, every day for 30 days straight. Insane asylum time.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-14-2005, 10:06 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: $33 vs. $22 on Party

If I'd try to play 4000 in a month, I would die. I'm not kidding. I would actually die.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-14-2005, 10:30 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: $33 vs. $22 on Party

I don't think it can be done either without the $1k on the line. If someone makes a wager then it becomes much easier to accomplish, but doing it with only your pride on the line.....i don't think so.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-14-2005, 10:33 AM
IdiotVig IdiotVig is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: $33 vs. $22 on Party

[ QUOTE ]
$1000 says I can do it in January.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dunno...12.5% rakeback is a sucky offer.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-14-2005, 10:50 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: $33 vs. $22 on Party

OMG!
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-14-2005, 11:00 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: $33 vs. $22 on Party

There was a respected poster, I think it was Irie, who said that he recommended jumping from the 22's to the 55's after you built the roll at the 22's. Combination of 1000 starting chips, and competition isn't THAT much better at the 55's than the 33's.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-14-2005, 11:08 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: $33 vs. $22 on Party

I started out at the 33's right away. Am I a cool crazy sexy genious?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.