Multitabling vs 1/2 Tables 6Max

[Isles]

[ QUOTE ]
At this point I go out of my mind if I'm not multi tabling.

[/ QUOTE ]

I completely agree, I got into single tabling only to try to fix a few things. I noticed it was zero stress and the winrate was good, so I stuck with it, although I will play two tables at times.

I agree there are plenty of good reasons to multi-table: boredom, time constraints, etc.

I just came across this while looking over my data and thought it worth an inquiry.

[Hoopster81]

[ QUOTE ]
That seems pretty high

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know about 400NL, but 10-tabling the 100s for 5-6 hours a day gets you there.

[Isles]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't know about 400NL, but 10-tabling the 100s for 5-6 hours a day gets you there.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ten tabling 6max? You're definitely one of the exceptions [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[scdavis0]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
That seems pretty high

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know about 400NL, but 10-tabling the 100s for 5-6 hours a day gets you there.

[/ QUOTE ]

W.A.F.G.

[Hoopster81]

[ QUOTE ]
W.A.F.G.

[/ QUOTE ]

To each his own. I think its a blast.

[GimmeDaWatch]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
all the better guys moved up

[/ QUOTE ]

I also datamine 1000NL 6max on Party. They can't go any higher there.

Besides, that still doesn't answer the question why someone would multi-table a particular limit.

If they are on a limit, and they are multi-tabling, and they aren't averaging more than a buyin a day, my question still stands...

[/ QUOTE ]

I would be very, very surprised if you were able to win more playing 1 table than 3-4 over any reasonable period of time, say 1-2 months. You say you easily win a buyin a day single tabling, but you dont mention how long this was for? If you were able to do this consistently for a month or two, your winrate would have to be pretty high. Sure you play better on only 1 table, but I dont think 3 or 4x better, and single-tabling doesn't stop you from running bad, which you evidently havent yet.

[xorbie]

You can definitely make a buy in every two hours 6 tabling 6 max.

[swarm]

Ok let's break this down. Let's say you play 1 table of 1/2. Let's say you play 10 hours a day. You are going to average at max 25 hands per hour. So that means at the end of the day you would play 250 hands.

To earn 1 buy in of 200 dollars you would have to be making 40BB/100 hands played.

I highly doubt you are making 40BB/100 considering a really good win rate at 1/2 would be 10BB/100.

[iceman5]

[ QUOTE ]
Ok let's break this down. Let's say you play 1 table of 1/2. Let's say you play 10 hours a day. You are going to average at max 25 hands per hour. So that means at the end of the day you would play 250 hands.

To earn 1 buy in of 200 dollars you would have to be making 40BB/100 hands played.

I highly doubt you are making 40BB/100 considering a really good win rate at 1/2 would be 10BB/100.

[/ QUOTE ]

25 hands per hour? I get more than that playing live.
I get about 60/hr playing full ring and about 85/hr playing 6 max.

[scdavis0]

Trying to convince us that playing one quarter of the hands at the same limit will lead to a higher hourly rate is a really tough sell.