|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4
[ QUOTE ]
hi arnfinn. when you get to the high stakes level you need to learn how to play against good players because the good players know how to play against you. if you dont know how to match their skills and are a dog to them you often wont be a favorite enough in the game even if there are fishies. you people saying that you have no interest in learning how to beat good players is truly startling. [/ QUOTE ] I don't know if you misread my post, or your reply is to others, since we agree totally. Better to be the shark taxing the other TAGs for sitting on the table than to pay the tax (as I do sometimes [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4
if all the gutshot draws either made pairs or a straight i like to check fold. Otherwise I usally still fold but sometimes call, and will bet if the board is paired low and we have a history of playing back at each other a lot.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4
No offense, but these hypotheticals ar very difficult because its so hard to just dream situations where you should and shouldn't call. Generally, i would feel comfortable saying that when he calls the flop and turn, it's more likely that he has a weka made hand or a showdownable hand of some sort since he has made no effort to get you to fold. If he was on a gutter draw with T-8 and he's good, he's putting in a raise somewhere. So, i guess against very good players you have the best hand about never here. Some exceptions are when he could have K high on some 2237 board, but he won't usually bet the river there.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4
I think c/f is good. Id assume most good K-highs and almost any A-high is 3 betting preflop or floating u postflop. Hard to say what I would c/c and c/f or b/f. I mean, a good player has either high card strength or a weak showdownable...maybe small pair on the flop and wants u to keep attacking. These situations suck when u just get called down. Hard to say when there has been no aggression whatsoever postflop.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4
First of all I would only consider check-calling the river here if the board stayed low and even then I usually wouldn't consider it for very long. To consider check calling I always have to remind myself that he needs to both have a worse hand and be willing to bet with it. The first problem in this case is that there are very few worse hands that would have just called the flop and the turn on a low board. He knows he isn't getting the correct odds to draw to two weak overcards on the turn and if he had a draw with or without showdown value he would very likely have raised somewhere. So if we rule out (or nearly out) overcard(s) with no showdown value and draws, that leaves us with pairs (which also probably would have raised at some point) or showdownable no-pair hands, both of which beat us.
Cartman |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4
yah ok this one isnt really close. its an easy fold i dont know what i was thinking when making the thread.
this is a problem i face against bad players, not good players. so pretend the BB is a loose/fairly passive player. what do you do on this river now? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4
[ QUOTE ]
yah ok this one isnt really close. its an easy fold i dont know what i was thinking when making the thread. this is a problem i face against bad players, not good players. so pretend the BB is a loose/fairly passive player. what do you do on this river now? [/ QUOTE ] This one should be more of a call than vs a TAG. On the one hand, he's more likely to have a weaker hand on the river, on the other hand, he's less likely to bluff at you. However, some players that are generally passive will often bluff the river here after calling down with J high. Some. With a read, it's an easier call, however, vs a loose/passive, I don't think inducing a bluff will often work unless you know he likes to do it. I guess the decision is between bet/fold or check/fold. If he has a very low fold turn %, that might make me more inclined to see a showdown in one way or another. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4
I'm probably still folding unless the board is very friendly to my calldown (paired and low, for example).
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4
[ QUOTE ]
so pretend the BB is a loose/fairly passive player. what do you do on this river now? [/ QUOTE ] Against a player of this type who has a tendency to autobet when checked to this is a nightmare, but I still usually fold. If the board is very low then I might call, especially if my kicker is big and he is the type that wouldn't necessarily 3-bet a medium/low Ace preflop. I have a similar nightmare when my pocket pair ends up 4th or 5th pair on a medium sized board or 3rd pair or 4th pair on a board with a couple of broadway cards. Obviously that is a huge overgeneralization, but what do you guys think about that caliber of pair vs a calling station who tends to autobet when checked to? Thanks, Cartman |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4
Preflop I raise a good, tough player. He calls. I bet flop and turn and he calls.
What will I do on river? A person who can answer this in a few sentences isnt a good and tough player so he should leave the table as fast as possible. |
|
|