Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-12-2005, 08:17 PM
Arnfinn Madsen Arnfinn Madsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 449
Default Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4

[ QUOTE ]
hi arnfinn. when you get to the high stakes level you need to learn how to play against good players because the good players know how to play against you. if you dont know how to match their skills and are a dog to them you often wont be a favorite enough in the game even if there are fishies. you people saying that you have no interest in learning how to beat good players is truly startling.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know if you misread my post, or your reply is to others, since we agree totally.

Better to be the shark taxing the other TAGs for sitting on the table than to pay the tax (as I do sometimes [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-12-2005, 01:57 AM
etizzle etizzle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 63
Default Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4

if all the gutshot draws either made pairs or a straight i like to check fold. Otherwise I usally still fold but sometimes call, and will bet if the board is paired low and we have a history of playing back at each other a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-12-2005, 02:08 AM
ggbman ggbman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 605
Default Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4

No offense, but these hypotheticals ar very difficult because its so hard to just dream situations where you should and shouldn't call. Generally, i would feel comfortable saying that when he calls the flop and turn, it's more likely that he has a weka made hand or a showdownable hand of some sort since he has made no effort to get you to fold. If he was on a gutter draw with T-8 and he's good, he's putting in a raise somewhere. So, i guess against very good players you have the best hand about never here. Some exceptions are when he could have K high on some 2237 board, but he won't usually bet the river there.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-12-2005, 03:52 AM
oreogod oreogod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Irregular, Regular
Posts: 405
Default Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4

I think c/f is good. Id assume most good K-highs and almost any A-high is 3 betting preflop or floating u postflop. Hard to say what I would c/c and c/f or b/f. I mean, a good player has either high card strength or a weak showdownable...maybe small pair on the flop and wants u to keep attacking. These situations suck when u just get called down. Hard to say when there has been no aggression whatsoever postflop.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-12-2005, 05:19 AM
cartman cartman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 366
Default Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4

First of all I would only consider check-calling the river here if the board stayed low and even then I usually wouldn't consider it for very long. To consider check calling I always have to remind myself that he needs to both have a worse hand and be willing to bet with it. The first problem in this case is that there are very few worse hands that would have just called the flop and the turn on a low board. He knows he isn't getting the correct odds to draw to two weak overcards on the turn and if he had a draw with or without showdown value he would very likely have raised somewhere. So if we rule out (or nearly out) overcard(s) with no showdown value and draws, that leaves us with pairs (which also probably would have raised at some point) or showdownable no-pair hands, both of which beat us.

Cartman
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-12-2005, 05:22 AM
TStoneMBD TStoneMBD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 268
Default Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4

yah ok this one isnt really close. its an easy fold i dont know what i was thinking when making the thread.

this is a problem i face against bad players, not good players.

so pretend the BB is a loose/fairly passive player. what do you do on this river now?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-12-2005, 05:29 AM
Pog0 Pog0 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27
Default Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4

[ QUOTE ]
yah ok this one isnt really close. its an easy fold i dont know what i was thinking when making the thread.

this is a problem i face against bad players, not good players.

so pretend the BB is a loose/fairly passive player. what do you do on this river now?

[/ QUOTE ]

This one should be more of a call than vs a TAG.
On the one hand, he's more likely to have a weaker hand on the river, on the other hand, he's less likely to bluff at you.

However, some players that are generally passive will often bluff the river here after calling down with J high. Some. With a read, it's an easier call, however, vs a loose/passive, I don't think inducing a bluff will often work unless you know he likes to do it. I guess the decision is between bet/fold or check/fold. If he has a very low fold turn %, that might make me more inclined to see a showdown in one way or another.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-12-2005, 05:38 AM
TheMetetron TheMetetron is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 92
Default Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4

I'm probably still folding unless the board is very friendly to my calldown (paired and low, for example).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-12-2005, 08:07 AM
cartman cartman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 366
Default Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4

[ QUOTE ]
so pretend the BB is a loose/fairly passive player. what do you do on this river now?

[/ QUOTE ]

Against a player of this type who has a tendency to autobet when checked to this is a nightmare, but I still usually fold. If the board is very low then I might call, especially if my kicker is big and he is the type that wouldn't necessarily 3-bet a medium/low Ace preflop.
I have a similar nightmare when my pocket pair ends up 4th or 5th pair on a medium sized board or 3rd pair or 4th pair on a board with a couple of broadway cards. Obviously that is a huge overgeneralization, but what do you guys think about that caliber of pair vs a calling station who tends to autobet when checked to?

Thanks,
Cartman
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-12-2005, 10:15 AM
kiddo kiddo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Stockholm, Sweden, Europe
Posts: 335
Default Re: Blind Battles: Hand #4

Preflop I raise a good, tough player. He calls. I bet flop and turn and he calls.

What will I do on river?

A person who can answer this in a few sentences isnt a good and tough player so he should leave the table as fast as possible.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.