|
|
|
|
#1
12-20-2005, 11:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $2/$4 hand
[ QUOTE ]
So I'd rather bet since it might eliminate one or two people [/ QUOTE ] Does your response change if this is not true? Jeff, you have to admit that 4th street came down really bad for Roland. Doesn't that make a fold fairly reasonable here? On the other hand, this is 2/4 and his opponents could all have 3 random cards. 
|
|
#2
12-20-2005, 11:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $2/$4 hand
I didn't say check-fold wasn't reasonable, just that I wouldn't do it. Since I'm tempted to call if there is a bet and a few callers, I'd rather bet myself since the ace is a scare card after I completed 3rd. Like I said, I'm not expecting to win the pot here with a bet, but it has other benefits.
I understand other good players would see this as a check-fold, and I don't mark it as a bad play. It is the safe play, and it is a reasonable play. It's just not the play I'm making here. But that's me - I can see it both ways. Jeff
|
|
#3
12-20-2005, 11:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $2/$4 hand
I don't complete here once there's someone in and there are many to act. I do call. Then it's easier to check/fold fourth. But hey, they don't all have to have four flushes, kings are semi-dead, you have a live pair and a live A, so as the hand plays I bet it.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
