|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: player last to act against allin states his hand, should it be killed?
interesting.
i agree on the fbomb rule..and felt bad for even asking if his hand was dead. so told him i'd delay some, which i did. so if you don't close out all action, that is when your hand is dead for saying what you have? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: player last to act against allin states his hand, should it be killed?
[ QUOTE ]
interesting. i agree on the fbomb rule..and felt bad for even asking if his hand was dead. so told him i'd delay some, which i did. so if you don't close out all action, that is when your hand is dead for saying what you have? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not 100% sure but I don't think your hand is dead when prematurely exposed even when not closing the action. There is confusion on this rule because about 5 years ago the rule was different. If you exposed your hand, it was dead. I know this because I survived a tourney with a beat hand when my opponent exposed his hand prematurely. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: player last to act against allin states his hand, should it be killed?
I did a little research. This is from the TDA which is used by most tourneys.
35 Expose A player who exposes his cards during the play may incur a penalty, but will not have his hand killed. link |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: player last to act against allin states his hand, should it be killed?
if you show your hand, it is dead. i know that says otherwise, but i do know your had is dead if shown..in a tournament.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: player last to act against allin states his hand, should it be kil
from TDA rule #37:
Verbally disclosing the contents of your hand (i assume the intent is to read 'with action remaining') or advising a player how to play a hand may result in a penalty. |
|
|