|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you fold, call, or raise this hand on the flop with a raise? | |||
| Call |
   
|
13 | 43.33% |
| ReRaise |
  
|
9 | 30.00% |
| Fold |
  
|
8 | 26.67% |
| Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#2
11-11-2005, 10:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
wacki, good idea in principle, but it is one which would be a horrible business move. If they charged people to use this site, traffic would go way down, advertising fees would go way down, visibility goes way down. 2p2 should get this, but charging people, come on man.
|
|
#3
11-11-2005, 10:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
[ QUOTE ]
wacki, good idea in principle, but it is one which would be a horrible business move. If they charged people to use this site, traffic would go way down, advertising fees would go way down, visibility goes way down. 2p2 should get this, but charging people, come on man. [/ QUOTE ] what about just charging for use of the improved search?
|
|
#4
11-11-2005, 10:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] wacki, good idea in principle, but it is one which would be a horrible business move. If they charged people to use this site, traffic would go way down, advertising fees would go way down, visibility goes way down. 2p2 should get this, but charging people, come on man. [/ QUOTE ] what about just charging for use of the improved search? [/ QUOTE ]um.....ok..... [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|
|
#5
11-11-2005, 10:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] wacki, good idea in principle, but it is one which would be a horrible business move. If they charged people to use this site, traffic would go way down, advertising fees would go way down, visibility goes way down. 2p2 should get this, but charging people, come on man. [/ QUOTE ] what about just charging for use of the improved search? [/ QUOTE ]um.....ok..... [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] What's so confusing? They could set up a more powerful search tool, and allow those of us to subscribe to it to do so. they could cover the cost of the software, and access to the site would not be restricted.
|
|
#6
11-11-2005, 10:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
so you are saying there should be two search engines? No offense bro, but that is just retarded.
|
|
#7
11-11-2005, 10:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
I think you would see people who don't pay getting the people that do to search for them. I don't like this idea. I support a fee for being able to post at all.
|
|
#8
11-12-2005, 01:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
I don't understand why anyone would vote against. This is the biggest improvement 2+2 could make.
If there is a problem money wise, what about making the arcives, or archive search, available for a fee? raisins
|
|
#9
11-12-2005, 01:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
[ QUOTE ]
If there is a problem money wise, what about making the arcives, or archive search, available for a fee? [/ QUOTE ] I voted yay, but what makes anyone think that 300 or 3000 people will pay to search archives? I am very curious how many people use the search and how often? Just to browse past the first ten pages or to find relavant info?
|
|
#10
11-12-2005, 02:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another open letter to 2+2
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If there is a problem money wise, what about making the arcives, or archive search, available for a fee? [/ QUOTE ] I voted yay, but what makes anyone think that 300 or 3000 people will pay to search archives? The very best info on this site is in the archives. I am very curious how many people use the search and how often? Just to browse past the first ten pages or to find relavant info? [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
