Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Books and Publications
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-20-2005, 08:46 PM
themflags themflags is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13
Default GSIH: \"outs to more outs\"?

I'm reading GSIH. On page 79 (discussing Limit), he writes that "'outs to more outs' are worth something". Does anybody know how to quantify this?

I think about this when I have a 3-flush -- if the turn is my suit, the number of my valid outs have sprung up to 9. But they say a back-door flush draw is really only worth 1.5 outs. This makes sense, since you need the river to help too. But is there something somewhere that elaborates a bit more fully on this topic?

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-20-2005, 08:57 PM
Ed Miller Ed Miller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Writing \"Small Stakes Hold \'Em\"
Posts: 4,548
Default Re: GSIH: \"outs to more outs\"?

[ QUOTE ]
I'm reading GSIH. On page 79 (discussing Limit), he writes that "'outs to more outs' are worth something". Does anybody know how to quantify this?

I think about this when I have a 3-flush -- if the turn is my suit, the number of my valid outs have sprung up to 9. But they say a back-door flush draw is really only worth 1.5 outs. This makes sense, since you need the river to help too. But is there something somewhere that elaborates a bit more fully on this topic?

Thanks!

[/ QUOTE ]

Small Stakes Hold 'em discusses this in detail.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-20-2005, 10:24 PM
MarkD MarkD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 492
Default Re: GSIH: \"outs to more outs\"?

[ QUOTE ]
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm reading GSIH. On page 79 (discussing Limit), he writes that "'outs to more outs' are worth something". Does anybody know how to quantify this?

I think about this when I have a 3-flush -- if the turn is my suit, the number of my valid outs have sprung up to 9. But they say a back-door flush draw is really only worth 1.5 outs. This makes sense, since you need the river to help too. But is there something somewhere that elaborates a bit more fully on this topic?

Thanks!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Small Stakes Hold 'em discusses this in detail.

[/ QUOTE ]

What a perfect answer. He's become Mason! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-21-2005, 02:20 PM
Toonces Toonces is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 31
Default Re: GSIH: \"outs to more outs\"?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But is there something somewhere that elaborates a bit more fully on this topic?

[/ QUOTE ]
Small Stakes Hold 'em discusses this in detail.

[/ QUOTE ]

What a perfect answer. He's become Mason! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

To be fair...Ed is responding to exactly the question that was asked. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-21-2005, 02:46 PM
ptmusic ptmusic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 513
Default Re: GSIH: \"outs to more outs\"?

[ QUOTE ]
I'm reading GSIH. On page 79 (discussing Limit), he writes that "'outs to more outs' are worth something". Does anybody know how to quantify this?

I think about this when I have a 3-flush -- if the turn is my suit, the number of my valid outs have sprung up to 9. But they say a back-door flush draw is really only worth 1.5 outs. This makes sense, since you need the river to help too. But is there something somewhere that elaborates a bit more fully on this topic?

Thanks!

[/ QUOTE ]

SSHE does a great job explaining all about outs, and when you are ready, you should get it and study it. But sometimes what works for me is just "keep it simple stupid." In this case, just memorize that a backdoor flush adds 1.5 outs to the other outs you have! It can thus put you over the top and have you continue in a hand you would otherwise fold.

Plus, sucking out runner runner style is awesome! The table thinks you are a moron, but you actually made a totally sound play, and you can use that image to win more in the session.

-ptmusic
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-21-2005, 02:48 PM
Derek in NYC Derek in NYC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 130
Default Re: GSIH: \"outs to more outs\"?

King Yao's book does a better job than SSH of quantifying the value of backdoor draws.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-21-2005, 06:52 PM
KingMarc KingMarc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Home: OC, CA College: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 120
Default Re: GSIH: \"outs to more outs\"?

[ QUOTE ]
King Yao's book does a better job than SSH of quantifying the value of backdoor draws.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yea, I'd have to agree.

Don't worry, I still love you and SSH, Ed :-P

Edit: I should really get paid for all my plugs ;-p
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.